[1]高娅鑫,屈清荣,王碧轩,等.重返工作自我效能问卷的汉化及其在癌症患者中的信效度检验[J].军事护理,2021,38(07):52-55.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.07.013]
　GAO Yaxin,QU Qingrong,WANG Bixuan,et al.Chinese Translation of the Return-To-Work Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in Cancer Patients and Its Reliability and Validity Test[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2021,38(07):52-55.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.07.013]
点击复制

重返工作自我效能问卷的汉化及其在癌症患者中的信效度检验
分享到：

《军事护理》[ISSN:2097-1826/CN:31-3186/R]

卷:
38
期数:
2021年07期
页码:
52-55
栏目:
研究荟萃
出版日期:
2021-07-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Chinese Translation of the Return-To-Work Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in Cancer Patients and Its Reliability and Validity Test
文章编号:
1008-9993(2021)07-0052-04
作者:
高娅鑫; 屈清荣; 王碧轩; 张宽新; 崔天娇
(郑州大学第一附属医院 胃肠外科,河南 郑州 450052)
Author(s):
GAO Yaxin; QU Qingrong; WANG Bixuan; ZHANG Kuanxin; CUI Tianjiao
(Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery,The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450052,China)
关键词:
癌症;  重返工作自我效能;  信度;  效度
Keywords:
cancer;  return-to-work self-efficacy;  reliability;  validity
分类号:
R473.73
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.07.013
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 对重返工作自我效能问卷(return-to-work self-efficacy questionnaire,RTW-SE)进行汉化和信效度检验。 方法 通过翻译、回译、跨文化调试及预调查,形成中文版RTW-SE问卷,并对郑州市1所三级甲等医院330例有长期工作的癌症患者进行问卷调查,分析问卷的信度和效度。结果 中文版RTW-SE问卷项目分析各条目与总分相关系数均在0.5 以上,决断值检验结果差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01)。内容效度为0.97。探索性因子分析提取出1个公因子,累计方差贡献率为67.491%。验证性因子分析结果显示,模型各项指标均达到标准,模型拟合度良好。总量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.932,折半信度为0.925,重测信度为0.827。结论 中文版重返工作自我效能问卷具有良好的信效度,可用于评估癌症患者重返工作自我效能水平。
Abstract:
Objective To translate the English version of the Return-To-Work Self-Efficacy Questionnaire(RTW-SE)into Chinese,and to test its reliability and validity.Methods The Chinese version of RTW-SE were formed by adopting forward and backward translation,cross-cultural semantic equivalence assessment,and pilot testing.The reliability and validity of RTW-SE were tested by taking questionaires among 330 cancer patients with long-term employment in a tertiary hospital in Zhengzhou.Results The item analysis of the Chinese version of RTW-SE indicated that the correlation coefficient of each item and total score was above 0.5,the critical ratio of each item showed statistically significant differences(all P<0.01).The content validity index(CVI)was 0.97.One factor was extracted by the exploratory factor analysis,and the factor cumulative variance contribution rate was 67.491%.The result of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that all the indexes of the model fitted well with the structure model.The Cronbach's α coefficient of the total scale was 0.932; the half-fold reliability of the total scale was 0.925; the test-retest was 0.827.Conclusions The Chinese version of RTW-SE has good reliability and validity and can be used to measure the return-to-work self-efficacy of cancer patients.

参考文献/References:

[1] CHEN W Q,ZHENG,R S,BAADE P D,et al. Cancer statistics in China,2015[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2016,66(2):115-132.
[2] DEBOER A G,,TASKILA T,OJAJARVI A,et al.Cancer survivors and unempoly-ment:a meta-analysis and meta-regression[J].JAMA,2009,301(7):753-762.
[3] MARY S K,ALISA G,VICTRINE T,et al.Qualitiative meta-synthesis of survivors'work experiences and the development of strategies to facilitate return to work[J].J Cancer Surviv,2014,8(4):657-670.
[4] LAGERVELD S E,BLONK R W,BRENNINKMEIJER V,et al.Return to work am-ong employees with mental health problems:development and validation of a self-efficacy questionnaire[J].Work & Stress,2010,24(4):359-375.
[5] LEENSEN M C,GROENEVELD I F,HEIDE I V,et al.Return to work of cancer patients after a multidisciplinary intervention including occupational counselling and physical exercise in cancer patients:a prospective study in the Netherlands[J/OL].[2021-06-22].http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6052846/.
[6] SILVAJUNIOR J S,SOUTO E P,FISCHER F M,et al.Validity and test-retest reliability of the Brazilian version of the Return-to-work self-efficacy questionnaire[J/OL].[2021-06-23].http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5623345/.
[7] BANDURA A.Self-efficacy:Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change[J].Psychol Rev,1977,84(2):191-215.
[8] BRISLIN R W.Back-translation for cross-cultural research[J].J Cross Cult Psychol,1970,1(3):185-216.
[9] 李峥,刘宇.护理学研究方法[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:71-90.
[10]第十三届全国人民代表大会常务委员会.中华人民共和国劳动法[EB/OL].[2021-03-25].http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c30834/201901/ffad2d4ae4da4585a041abf66e74753c.shtml.
[11]吴明隆.问卷统计分析实务:SPSS操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010:196-204.
[12]郑日昌.心理测量与测验[M].2版.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2013:91-96.
[13]WOLVERS M D,LEENSEN M C,GROENEVELD I F,et al.Predictors for earlier return to work of cancer patients[J].J Cancer Surviv,2018,12(2):169-177.
(本文编辑:沈园园)

相似文献/References:

[1]许嘉硕,季红娟,李佳镁,等.癌症患者重返工作适应体验及应对资源的扎根理论研究[J].军事护理,2021,38(02):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.02.001]
　XU Jiashuo,JI Hongjuan,LI Jiamei,et al.Adaptation Experience and Coping Resources of Cancer Patients Returning to Work: A Grounded Theory Study[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2021,38(07):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.02.001]
[2]信博,赵秋利,王楠楠.癌症高危人群癌症风险感知的研究进展[J].军事护理,2021,38(03):41.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.03.010]
[3]周帅,江锦芳,张玲,等.不同运动疗法对癌症患者癌因性疲乏干预效果的网状Meta分析[J].军事护理,2021,38(08):65.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.08.017]
　ZHOU Shuai,JIANG Jinfang,ZHANG Ling,et al.Different Exercise Therapies in Patients with Cancer-related Fatigue: A Network Meta-Analysis[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2021,38(07):65.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.08.017]
[4]曾庆威,罗梦娜,王菲菲,等.青少年癌症幸存者重返校园体验与期待的质性研究[J].军事护理,2021,38(12):46.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.12.012]
　ZENG Qingwei,LUO Mengna,WANG Feifei,et al.Return-To-School Experience and Expectations of Adolescent Cancer Survivors:A Qualitative Study[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2021,38(07):46.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.12.012]
[5]陈娟娟,李惠萍,张婷,等.癌症患者及其配偶二元关系的研究进展[J].军事护理,2021,38(12):79.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.12.021]
[6]刘贺,郑蔚,苏闪闪,等.癌症患者夫妻疾病沟通评估工具的研究进展[J].军事护理,2022,39(03):82.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2022.03.020]
[7]胡扬帆,彭雪兰,赵娟娟.癌症生命末期照护家属决策自我效能量表的汉化和信效度评价[J].军事护理,2022,39(04):42.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2022.04.011]
　HU Yangfan,PENG Xuelan,ZHAO Juanjuan.Chinese Version of Family Decision-making Self-efficacy Scale Regarding End-of-life Care Decisions of Cancer Patients: Reliability and Validity[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2022,39(07):42.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2022.04.011]
[8]李佳镁,郭瑜洁,陈思琪,等.基于CiteSpace的癌症职业康复研究热点分析[J].军事护理,2022,39(06):60.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2022.06.015]
　LI Jiamei,GUO Yujie,CHEN Siqi,et al.Hotspots of Cancer Occupational Rehabilitation Research Based on CiteSpace[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2022,39(07):60.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2022.06.015]
[9]肖霖,黄重梅,方庆虹,等.基于扎根理论的癌症患者关系性自主治疗决策行为理论框架的构建研究[J].军事护理,2022,39(07):66.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2022.07.017]
　XIAO Lin,HUANG Chongmei,FANG Qinghong,et al.Construction of the Theoretical Framework of Relational Autonomy Treatment Decision-Making Behaviors Among Cancer Patients: A Grounded Theory Study[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2022,39(07):66.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2022.07.017]
[10]汤聪,乔成平,姜晨,等.我国癌症人群重返工作岗位现状及影响因素的系统评价[J].军事护理,2022,39(08):73.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2022.08.019]
　TANG Cong,QIAO Chengping,JIANG Chen,et al.Status Quo of Cancer Survivors' Returning to Work and Its Influencing Factors in China:A Systematic Review[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2022,39(07):73.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2022.08.019]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【 收稿日期 】 2021-03-15 【 修回日期 】 2021-07-02
【 基金项目 】 河南省高等学校重点科研项目(20A320026); 郑州大学研究生创新项目
【 作者简介 】 高娅鑫,硕士在读,护师,从事外科护理 工作
【 通信作者 】 屈清荣,电话:0371-66862216
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-07-15