[1]赵文欣,程艳娜,刘继军,等.改良螺旋式桡动脉止血器在经桡动脉行冠状动脉介入术后护理中的应用[J].解放军护理杂志,2021,38(06):90-92.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.06.024]
　ZHAO Wenxin,CHENG Yanna,LIU Jijun,et al.Application of Modified Spiral Radial Artery Hemostat in the Postoperative Care of Transradial Coronary Intervention[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People’s Laberation Army,2021,38(06):90-92.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.06.024]
点击复制

改良螺旋式桡动脉止血器在经桡动脉行冠状动脉介入术后护理中的应用()
分享到：

《解放军护理杂志》[ISSN:2097-1826/CN:31-3186/R]

卷:
38
期数:
2021年06期
页码:
90-92
栏目:
技术与方法
出版日期:
2021-06-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of Modified Spiral Radial Artery Hemostat in the Postoperative Care of Transradial Coronary Intervention
文章编号:
1008-9993(2021)06-0090-03
作者:
赵文欣1; 程艳娜2; 刘继军2; 丁小勇3
1.河南中医药大学 护理学院,河南 郑州450042; 2.联勤保障部队第988医院 心内科,河南 郑州 450042; 3.联勤保障部队第988医院 心胸外科
Author(s):
ZHAO Wenxin1; CHENG Yanna2; LIU Jijun2; DING Xiaoyong3
1.School of Nursing,Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Zhengzhou 450042,Henan Province,China; 2.Department of Cardiology,988 Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force,Zhengzhou 450042,Henan Province,China; 3.Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery,988 Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force
关键词:
冠状动脉介入术;  桡动脉;  止血器;  舒适度;  护理
Keywords:
transradial coronary intervention;  radial artery;  hemostatic device;  comfort;  nursing
分类号:
R472.4
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.06.024
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨改良螺旋式桡动脉止血器在经桡动脉行冠状动脉介入(transradial coronary intervention,TRI)术后护理中的应用效果。方法 便利抽样法选取2020年6-12月在某院心内科行TRI的术后患者262例患者为研究对象。按时间先后将分为对照组和观察组,每组131患者。对照组采用未改良螺旋式止血器压迫,而观察组采用改良螺旋式止血器压迫。比较两组患者术后止血效果,术后1、2(第1次减压)、4(第2次减压)及6 h(撤除止血器)的腕部及手掌的疼痛、麻木、肿胀程度; 分析两组使用止血器前、后血氧饱和度差异; 统计两组患者使用止血器后压力性损伤发生情况。结果 两组患者在出血、血肿、重新调整止血器压迫止血及腕部压力性损伤上的差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05); 术后1、2、4 h的疼痛、麻木、肿胀程度评分差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.001),但术后6 h,上述各项评分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05); 使用止血器前、后,脉搏血氧饱和度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 改良螺旋式桡动脉止血器能显著降低TRI术后患者腕部、手掌及手指的疼痛、麻木、肿胀程度,提高患者舒适度。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the application of modified spiral radial artery hemostat in the postoperative care of transradial coronary intervention(TRI).Methods A total of 262 patients who underwent TRI in a cardiology department from June to December 2020 were selected and divided into two groups according to the operation time by convenience sampling method.The control group(n=131)used the traditional screw hemostatic device,while the experimental group(n=131)used the modified screw hemostatic device.The hemostatic effect and the pain,numbness,swelling of the wrists as well as palms at 1,2(the first decompression),4(the second decompression),and 6 h(removal of the hemostatic device)after the operation were compared between the two groups.The blood oxygen saturation(SpO2)difference before and after using the hemostatic device was analyzed between the two groups.The occurrence of pressure injury after using the hemostatic device were compared between the two groups.Results There were no significant differences in bleeding,hematoma,pressure hemostasis by readjusted hemostat and wrist pressure injury between 2 groups(all P>0.05).There were statistically significant differences in the pain,numbness and swelling scores at 1,2 and 4 h after surgery(all P<0.001),but there were no statistically significant differences in the above scores at 6 h after surgery(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in pulse oxygen saturation before and after using hemostatic device(P>0.05). Conclusions The modified spiral radial artery hemostatic device can significantly improve the pain, numbness and swelling of the wrist, palm and fingers of patients after TRI.

参考文献/References:

[1] 中华医学会心血管病学分会介入心脏病学组,中国医师协会心血管内科医师分会血栓防治专业委员会,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南(2016)[J].中华心血管病杂志,2016,44(5):382-400.
[2] MARTIAL H,CHRISTIAN P,CARLO D M,et al.Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions:position paper by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Careand Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology[J].EuroIntervention,2013,8(11):1242-1251.
[3] 童成枝,胡松,张海艳.经桡动脉穿刺冠脉介入诊疗术后穿刺伤口出血的危险因素分析[J].当代护士:综合版,2016(5):56-58.
[4] 熊碧文.两种途径冠状动脉介入治疗后并发症及患者舒适度的比较[J].解放军护理杂志,2009,26(11A):1-3.
[5] 张淑,王建宁,周松,等.螺旋式与气囊式桡动脉压迫止血器应用效果的系统评价[J].护理研究,2019,33(13):2252-2258.
[6] 杨龙飞,宋冰,倪翠萍,等.2019版《压力性损伤的预防和治疗:临床实践指南》更新解读[J].中国护理管理,2020,20(12):1849-1854.
[7] 张彩虹,丁飚,高美芳,等.经桡动脉行PCI术后患者发生上肢血管并发症的相关因素分析[J].护士进修杂志,2017,32(6):522-524.
[8] 李霞.护理干预对四肢骨折术后肢体肿胀患者康复效果评估[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志,2019,6(22):98-99.
[9] 任玉娇,朱丽萍.便携式电子感应硬胶海绵垫在TRI术后的应用[J].护士进修杂志,2017,32(4):307.
[10]冯湘萍,于惠芳,吴泽君.两种止血器在高龄患者经桡动脉介入术后的应用比较[J].现代临床护理,2013,12(8):52-55.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【 收稿日期 】 2021-02-23 【 修回日期 】 2021-05-14
【 作者简介 】 赵文欣,本科,护士,从事临床护理工作
【 通信作者 】 丁小勇,电话:0371-81653370
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-06-15