[1]黄玲芳,王宗华,孔德辉,等.基于CIPP模型军校护理本科专业课课程思政教学评价指标体系研究[J].军事护理,2023,40(08):105-108.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2023.08.025]
　HUANG Lingfang,WANG Zonghua,KONG Dehui,et al.Construction of An Evaluation Index System of Ideological and Political Education in Nursing Undergraduate Courses in Military Colleges Based on CIPP Model[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2023,40(08):105-108.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2023.08.025]
点击复制

基于CIPP模型军校护理本科专业课课程思政教学评价指标体系研究
分享到：

《军事护理》[ISSN:2097-1826/CN:31-3186/R]

卷:
40
期数:
2023年08期
页码:
105-108
栏目:
护理教育
出版日期:
2023-08-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Construction of An Evaluation Index System of Ideological and Political Education in Nursing Undergraduate Courses in Military Colleges Based on CIPP Model
文章编号:
2097-1826(2023)08-0105-04
作者:
黄玲芳; 王宗华; 孔德辉; 陈堃; 洪燕; 林莉
(陆军军医大学 护理学院,重庆 400038)
Author(s):
HUANG Lingfang; WANG Zonghua; KONG Dehui; CHEN Kun; HONG Yan; LIN Li
(School of Nursing,Army Medical University,Chongqing 400038,China)
关键词:
护理;  课程思政;  指标体系;  CIPP模型;  德尔菲法;  层次分析法
Keywords:
nursing;  ideological and political education;  index system;  CIPP model;  Delphi method;  analytic hierarchy process
分类号:
R823; R473.82
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2023.08.025
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 构建军校护理本科专业课课程思政教学评价指标体系,为评价课程思政教学效果提供工具。方法 以CIPP模型为理论框架,通过文献研究和专家会议初拟评价指标,选取16名军医大学教育领域专家进行3轮专家函询,采用层次分析法计算指标权重。结果 第3轮函询专家积极性为93.8%,专家权威系数为0.89,3个子系统的肯德尔协调系数分别为0.189、0.336、0.157(均P<0.01),指标的重要性赋值为4.13～5.00。评价指标体系由同行专家评教、学生评教和教师自评3个子系统组成,共12个一级指标、35个二级指标。结论 军校护理本科专业课课程思政教学评价指标体系的构建方法科学、指标可靠、权重合理,可以为军校护理专业课课程思政教学评价提供依据。
Abstract:
Objective To construct an evaluation index system of ideological and political education in nursing undergraduate courses in military colleges,and to provide a tool for evaluating the outcomes and effect of ideological and political education.Methods Base on CIPP model,the evaluation indexes were drafted by literature research and expert meeting.Sixteen experts in the field of military medical higher education were selected for three rounds of expert consultation.The weights of evaluation indexes were calculated by analytic hierarchy process.Results The response rate of the third rounds of expert consultation were 93.8%,and the expert authority coefficient was 0.89 in the third round of expert consultation.The Kendall coordination coefficient of three subsystems were 0.189,0.336,and 0.157(all P<0.01).The importance assignment of indexes were 4.13-5.00.The evaluation index system consisted of three subsystems: peer experts' evaluation,students' evaluation,and teachers' self-evaluation,including 12 first-level indexes and 35 second-level indexes.Conclusions The evaluation index system for ideological and political education in nursing undergraduate courses in military colleges was scientifically constructed,all the indexes were reliable and assigned reasonable weights.It can provide a basis for the evaluation of ideological and political education in nursing course in military colleges.

参考文献/References:

[1] 中华人民共和国教育部.教育部关于印发《高等学校课程思政建设指导纲要》的通知[EB/OL].[2022-06-05].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/202006/t20200603_462437.html.
[2] 陈洁瑾,江增光.基于计量可视分析的课程思政研究综述[J].南宁职业技术学院学报,2022,30(1):14-23.
[3] 何佳洁,单彬.多元视角下课程思政评价体系的构建[J].梧州学院学报,2022,32(1):66-72.
[4] STUFFLEBEAM D,CORYN C L S.评估理论、模型和应用[M].2版.北京:国防工业出版社,2019:219-220.
[5] 刁子晏,吴贞,章洁,等.机动卫勤力量护理人员抽组辅助决策信息指标体系的构建[J].解放军护理杂志,2022,39(5):88-91.
[6] 巫银花.综合评价方法及其军事应用[M].北京:兵器工业出版社,2022:11-19.
[7] WEI W,LIU J,LIU Y,et al.Evaluation index system of education quality for nursing professional degree postgraduate using the analytic hierarchy process[J/OL].[2022-06-05].https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8615440/.DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000027771.
[8] 马孟伟,王茜,金莉,等.护理本科专业课课程思政教学评价指标体系的构建[J].护理学杂志,2022,37(1):6-10.
[9] 巩茹敏,林铁松.课程思政:隐性思想政治教育的新形态[J].教学与研究,2019,53(6):45-51.

相似文献/References:

[1]胡韵,施逸雯,胡静超,等.跨专业职业素养评估量表的汉化和信效度研究[J].军事护理,2021,38(10):28.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.10.008]
　HU Yun,SHI Yiwen,HU Jingchao,et al.Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Interprofessional Professionalism Assessment[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2021,38(08):28.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.10.008]
[2]张艺琳,董晓雨,叶艺,等.护理硕士研究生心理资本潜在剖面分析及与情绪幸福感的关系[J].军事护理,2021,38(12):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.12.001]
　ZHANG Yilin,DONG Xiaoyu,YE Yi,et al.Latent Profile Analysis of Psychological Capital of Nursing Graduates and Its Relationship with Emotional Well-Being[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2021,38(08):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.12.001]
[3]杨晨,陈瑜,王钰莹,等.2006-2021年护理学者国家自然科学基金立项情况分析与申报对策[J].军事护理,2022,39(09):53.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2022.09.014]
　YANG Chen,CHEN Yu,WANG Yuyin,et al.Analysis of Nursing Scholars' Successful application for National Natural Science Foundation of China from 2006 to 2021[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2022,39(08):53.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2022.09.014]
[4]曹熙,曾兢,何春渝,等.全国大学生医学技术技能大赛护理学专业赛道西南西北分区赛介绍及启示[J].军事护理,2022,39(10):98.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2022.10.026]
　CAO Xi,ZENG Jing,HE Chunyu,et al.Introduction and Enlightenment of the Southwest and Northwest Areas of the National College Students Medical Technical Skills Competition for Nursing Majors[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2022,39(08):98.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2022.10.026]
[5]马秋平,曹汝汝,陈玲.护理硕士专业学位研究生核心能力的研究热点及前沿分析[J].军事护理,2023,40(01):94.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2023.01.022]
　MA Qiuping,CAO Ruru,CHEN Ling.Analysis of Hot topics on Core Competence of Postgraduate Master Students in Nursing Specialist[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2023,40(08):94.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2023.01.022]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【 收稿日期 】 2022-08-01 【 修回日期 】 2023-07-03
【 基金项目 】 2022年陆军军医大学课程思政专项研究课题(2022KCSZ-B15); 重庆市高等教育教学改革研究项目(213481)
【 作者简介 】 黄玲芳,博士在读,助教,电话:023-68771830
【 通信作者 】 林莉,电话:023-68752353
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-08-15