[1]屈虹,唐绪容,周蓉,等.脑肿瘤切除手术患儿术中压力性损伤风险预测模型的构建[J].军事护理,2023,40(04):19-23.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2023.04.005]
　QU Hong,TANG Xurong,ZHOU Rong,et al.Construction of Risk Prediction Model of Intraopratively Acquired Pressure Injuries in Children Undergoing Brain Tumor Resection[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2023,40(04):19-23.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2023.04.005]
点击复制

脑肿瘤切除手术患儿术中压力性损伤风险预测模型的构建
分享到：

《军事护理》[ISSN:2097-1826/CN:31-3186/R]

卷:
40
期数:
2023年04期
页码:
19-23
栏目:
儿童护理专栏
出版日期:
2023-04-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Construction of Risk Prediction Model of Intraopratively Acquired Pressure Injuries in Children Undergoing Brain Tumor Resection
文章编号:
2097-1826(2023)04-0019-05
作者:
屈虹1; 唐绪容1; 周蓉1; 付绍川1; 曾炜1; 牟绍玉2
(1.重庆医科大学附属儿童医院 手术室,重庆 400014; 2.重庆医科大学 护理学院,重庆 400016)
Author(s):
QU Hong1; TANG Xurong1; ZHOU Rong1; FU Shaochuan1; ZENG Wei1; MOU Shaoyu2
(1.Operating Room,Children's Hospital Affiliated to Chongqing Medical University,Chongqing 400014,China; 2.School of Nursing,Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016,China)
关键词:
脑肿瘤;  压力性损伤;  护理;  手术;  列线图
Keywords:
brain tumor;  pressure injury;  nursing care;  operation;  nomogram
分类号:
R473.72
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2023.04.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 分析儿童脑肿瘤术中压力性损伤(intraopratively acquired pressure injuries,IAPIs)的危险因素,建立其风险列线图模型,为儿童脑肿瘤IAPIs预防策略提供依据。方法 收集2019年8月至2021年2月接受脑肿瘤手术治疗460例患儿临床资料。通过单因素和Logistic分析IAPIs发生风险因素,用R软件构建其列线图模型,利用受试者工作特征曲线(receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC)下面积判断列线图模型预测能力,并计算一致性指数(index of concordance,C-index)评价模型区分度,绘制校准曲线评估预测结果与实际结果一致性。结果 Logistic分析显示:年龄、术中出血、术中体温、术中使用升压药、手术时间是IAPIs独立危险因素(均P<0.05); ROC提示列线图模型有较好区分度; 内部验证C-index值为0.956,外部验证C-index值为0.981; 校准曲线显示预测结果与实际结果之间有较好一致性。结论 本研究分析脑肿瘤切除手术患儿术中压力性损伤相关风险因素,构建列线图预测模型有较好预测价值,可为临床个体化预测儿童脑肿瘤手术中IAPIs发生风险提供参考。
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the risk factors of intraopratively acquired pressure injuries(IAPIs)in children undergoing brain tumor resection and establish a risk prediction model.Methods From August 2019 to February 2021,clinic data of 460 children undergoing brain tumor resection were enrolled.The risk factors of IAPIs were analyzed by single factor and Logistic analysis,and the nomogram model was constructed by R software.The predictive ability of the nomogram model was judged by the area under receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC),and the model differentiation was evaluated by the consistency index(C-index).A calibration curve was drawn to evaluate the consistency between the predicted results and the actual results.Results Logistic analysis showed that age,intraoperative bleeding,intraoperative body temperature,intraoperative use of pressors and operative time were independent risk factors for IAPIs(all P<0.05).ROC suggested that the line graph model had good differentiation.The C-index value of internal verification was 0.956,and the C-index value of external verification was 0.981.The calibration curve showed a good agreement between the predicted results and the actual results.Conclusions The analysis of related risk factors of IAPIs and the construction of a nomogram prediction model in this study are of good predictive value,which can provide reference for individualized clinical prediction of the risk of pressure injury during pediatric brain tumor surgery.

参考文献/References:

[1] National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel.NPUAP pressure injury stages[EB/OL].[2022-06-24].https://www.npuap.org/resources/educational-and-clinical-resources/npuap-pressure-injury-stages/.
[2] GAO L,YANG L,LI X,et al.The use of a logistic regression model to develop a risk assessment of intraoperatively acquired pressure ulcer[J].Clin Nurs,2018,27(15-16):2984-2992.
[3] XIONG C,GAO X,MA Q,et al.Risk factors for intraoperative pressure injuries in patients undergoing digestive surgery:a retrospective study[J].Clin Nurs,2019,28(7-8):1148-1155.
[4] O'BRIEN D D,SHANKS A M,TALSMA A,et al.Intraoperative risk factors associated with post operative pressure ulcers in critically ill patients:a retrospective observational study[J].Crit Care Med,2014,42(1):40-47.
[5] KRIESBERG LANGE C P,LITTLE J M,MOHR L,et al.Reducing pressure injuries in pediatric cardiac care unit:a quality improvement project[J].J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs,2018,45(6):497-502.
[6] COX J.Predictors of pressure ulcers in adult critical care patients[J].Am J Crit Care,2011,20(5):364-375.
[7] 高兴莲,郭莉.术中获得性压力性损伤危险因素评估量表的编制及信效度检验[J].中华护理杂志,2021,56(4):556-560.
[8] MERVIS J S,PHILLIPS T J.Pressure ulcers:pathophysiology,epidemiology,risk factors and presentation[J].Am Acad Dermatol,2019,81(4):881-890.
[9] HOOGENDOORN I,REENALDA J,KOOPMAN B,et al.The effect of pressure and shear on tissue viability of human skin in relation to the development of pressure ulcers:a systematic review[J].J Tissue Viability,2017,26(3):157-171.
[10]FREUNDLICH K.Pressure injuries in medically complex children:a review[J/OL].[2022-07-12].https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5406684/.DOI:10.3390/children4040025.
[11]BAZALINSKI D,MIDURA B,WOJCIK A,et al.Selected biochemical blood parameters and a risk of pressure ulcers in patients receiving treatment in intensive care units[J/OL].[2022-07-12].https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC792 2769/.DOI:10.3390/medicina57020177.
[12]孙锟,沈颖,黄国英.小儿内科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2020:9-22.
[13]ZHANG H,MA Y,WANG Q,et al.Incidence and prevalence of pressure injuries in children patients:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].J Tissue Viability,2022,31(1):142-151.
[14]BARGOS-MUNARRIZ M,BERMUDEZ-PEREZ M,MARTINEZ-AlONSO A M,et al.Prevention of pressure injuries in critically ill children:a preliminary evaluation[J].J Tissue Viability,2020,29(4):310-318.
[15]宋思平,刘晓晴,蒋琪霞.压力性损伤风险预测模型的研究进展[J].中华护理杂志,2020,55(4):628-631.
[16]XU W,YU X,JIANG H,et al.A nomogram prediction of pressure injury in critical ill patients:a retrospective cohort study[J].Int Wound J,2022,19(4):826-833.

相似文献/References:

[1]张茜茜,孙妹,王春玲,等.失效模式与效应分析在预防减重手术患者压力性损伤中的应用及效果[J].军事护理,2021,38(02):37.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.02.010]
　ZHANG Qianqian,SUN Mei,WANG Chunling,et al.Application and Effect of Failure Mode and Effect Analysis in Prevention of Stress Injury during Weight Loss Surgery[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2021,38(04):37.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.02.010]
[2]张诗怡,赵体玉,乐霄,等.俯卧位手术患者受压部位微环境动态监测及分析[J].军事护理,2021,38(10):24.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.10.007]
　ZHANG Shiyi,ZHAO Tiyu,LE Xiao,et al.Microclimate of Compressed Part of Surgical Patients in Prone Position: Dynamic Monitoring and Analysis[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2021,38(04):24.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.10.007]
[3]张琪,吕小英,周庆,等.表皮下水分扫描仪在压力性损伤中的应用研究进展[J].军事护理,2021,38(12):76.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.12.020]
[4]缪爱梅,何小兰,倪亚利,等.基于微环境理论的延续性护理对截瘫患者皮瓣修复术后再发压力性损伤的影响[J].军事护理,2022,39(06):35.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2022.06.009]
　MIAO Aimei,HE Xiaolan,NI Yali,et al.Effect of Continuity of Care Based on Microclimate Theory on the Recurrence of Pressure Injury in Patients with Paraplegia After Skin Flap Repair Operation[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2022,39(04):35.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2022.06.009]
[5]顾梦倩,曹松梅,赵燕燕,等.成人医疗器械相关压力性损伤预防管理的循证实践[J].军事护理,2022,39(08):7.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2022.08.003]
　GU Mengqian,CAO Songmei,ZHAO Yanyan,et al.Evidence-based Implementation on Preventing Medical Device-related Pressure Injury in Intensive Care Unit[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2022,39(04):7.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2022.08.003]
[6]李好正,李梦媛,肖抒情,等.脑肿瘤患者术后误吸风险预测模型的构建[J].军事护理,2022,39(08):54.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2022.08.014]
　LI Haozheng,LI Mengyuan,XIAO Shuqing,et al.Construction of Postoperative Aspiration Risk Prediction Model for Brain Tumor Patients[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2022,39(04):54.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2022.08.014]
[7]林淑洁,张立秀,陈香萍,等.可穿戴设备在压力性损伤预防中的研究进展[J].军事护理,2023,40(12):93.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2023.12.023]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【 收稿日期 】 2022-08-22 【 修回日期 】 2023-02-16
【 基金项目 】 重庆医科大学附属儿童医院护理院级科研项目(CHCQMU2019.12)
【 作者简介 】 屈虹,硕士在读,主管护师,电话:023-63632143
【 通信作者 】 牟绍玉,电话:023-89012797
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-04-15