[1]吴中义,邹圣强,王宜庭,等.麻醉后监测治疗室转出准备度评估量表的汉化和信效度检验[J].军事护理,2022,39(11):5-8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2022.11.002]
　WU Zhongyi,ZOU Shengqiang,WANG Yiting,et al.Chinese Translation of the Discerning Post Anesthesia Readiness for Transition Tool and Its Reliability and Validity Testing[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2022,39(11):5-8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2022.11.002]
点击复制

麻醉后监测治疗室转出准备度评估量表的汉化和信效度检验
分享到：

《军事护理》[ISSN:2097-1826/CN:31-3186/R]

卷:
39
期数:
2022年11期
页码:
5-8
栏目:
工具研发专栏
出版日期:
2022-11-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Chinese Translation of the Discerning Post Anesthesia Readiness for Transition Tool and Its Reliability and Validity Testing
文章编号:
2097-1826(2022)11-0005-04
作者:
吴中义1; 邹圣强2; 王宜庭1; 时佳琪3; 毕岑3; 高君艳3
(1.江苏大学附属医院 麻醉科，江苏 镇江 212001; 2.江苏大学附属镇江三院 重症医学科，江苏 镇江 212001; 3.江苏大学 医学院，江苏 镇江 212001)
Author(s):
WU Zhongyi1; ZOU Shengqiang2; WANG Yiting1; SHI Jiaqi3; BI Cen3; GAO Junyan3
(1.Department of Anesthesiology,Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University,Zhenjiang 212001,Jiangsu Province,China; 2.Department of Critical Care Medicine,Third People's Hospital of Zhenjiang,Jiangsu University,Zhenjiang 212001,Jiangsu Province,China; 3.School of Medicine,Jiangsu University,Zhenjiang 212001,Jiangsu Province,China)
关键词:
麻醉后监测治疗室;  出室评估;  全身麻醉;  信度;  效度
Keywords:
post anesthesia care unit;  transition assessment;  general anesthesia;  reliability;  validity
分类号:
R47
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2022.11.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 汉化麻醉后监测治疗室转出准备度评估量表(discerning post anesthesia readiness for transition tool，DPART)，在入麻醉后监测治疗室(post anesthesia care unit，PACU)的患者中检验其信效度。方法 按照Brislin翻译模式对DPART进行翻译、回译，通过专家咨询和预调查对中文版DPART进行文化调试。采用便利抽样法，对210例全身麻醉未拔出气管导管入PACU的患者进行调查，检验该量表的信效度。结果 中文版DPART保留14个条目，析出3个公因子，累积方差贡献率60.963%。量表各条目的内容效度在0.86～1.00，量表的内容效度指数为0.905。量表和Aldrete量表呈正相关(r=0.908，P<0.01)。量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.756，评价者间信度为0.925(P<0.01)。结论 中文版DPART具有良好的信效度，适合中国文化背景下全身麻醉术后患者转出PACU的评估。
Abstract:
Objective To translate the Discerning Post Anesthesia Readiness for Transition Tool(DPART)into Chinese, and test its reliability and validity among the patients in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit(PACU).Methods The Brislin translation model was followed to translate and back-translate the DPART.Expert consultation and pilot study were adopted to culturally adapting the Chinese version of DPART.Convenient sampling was used to select 210 patients who entered the PACU under general anesthesia without pulling out the endotracheal tube for investigation, and reliability and validity testing of the tool.Results The Chinese version of DPART included 14 items, clustering into three common factors, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 60.963%.The content validity of each item of DPART ranged from 0.86 to 1.00, and the content validity index of DPART was 0.905.The score of DPART was positively correlated with the score of Aldrete scale(r=0.908, P<0.01).The Cronbach's α coefficient of DPART was 0.756, and the inter-rater reliability was 0.925(P<0.01).Conclusions The Chinese version of DPART has good reliability and validity, and is suitable for assessing the transition out of the PACU among patients under general anesthesia in the Chinese cultural background.

参考文献/References:

[1] WEISSMAN C,SCEMAMA J,WEISS Y G.The ratio of PACU length-of-stay to surgical duration:practical observations[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2019,63(9):1143-1151.
[2] BRUINS S D,LEONG P M,NG S Y.Retrospective review of critical incidents in the post-anaesthesia care unit at a major tertiary hospital[J].Singapore Med J,2017,58(8):497-501.
[3] 廖礼平,王曙.全身麻醉术后患者苏醒期并发症发生情况调查分析[J].护理学杂志,2016,31(2):61-63.
[4] ABDULLAH H R,CHUNG F.Postoperative issues:discharge criteria[J].Anesthesiol Clin,2014,32(2),487-493.
[5] WHITLEY D R,CROW P H,GORE P C,et al.Discerning post anesthesia readiness for transition(DPART):a measurement tool[J].J Perianesth Nurs,2020,35(2):160-170.
[6] TRUONG L,MORAN J L,BLUM P.Post anaesthesia care unit discharge:a clinical scoring system versus traditional time-based criteria[J].Anaesth Intensive Care,2004,32(1):33-42.
[7] 郭曲练,程智刚,胡浩.中华医学会麻醉学分会.麻醉后监测治疗专家共识[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2021,37(1):89-94.
[8] 郭金玉,李峥.量表引进的过程及评价标准[J].中华护理杂志,2012,47(3):283-285.
[9] 白雪,马洪升,罗利.中外日间手术发展对比研究及展望[J].中国医院管理,2014,34(5):35-37.
[10]LI L,LIU X,HERR K.Postoperative pain intensity assessment:a comparison of four scales in Chinese adults[J].Pain Med,2007,8(3):223-224.
[11]倪平,陈京立,刘娜.护理研究中量性研究的样本量估计[J].中华护理杂志,2010,45(4):378-379.
[12]肖霖,彭美芳,缪景霞,等.患者沟通模式量表的汉化及其在我国癌症人群中的信效度检验[J].解放军护理杂志,2021,38(11):46-49.
[13]杨华文,易凤琼,曾彦超,等.麻醉恢复室出室评估工具研究进展[J].重庆医学,2021,50(11):1946-1949,1953.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【 收稿日期 】 2022-03-14 【 修回日期 】 2022-10-06
【 基金项目 】 国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所基金项目(YLZLXZ2021007); 江苏省卫生健康委医学科研立项(Z2021054)
【 作者简介 】 吴中义，硕士在读，护士，从事麻醉护理研究
【 通信作者 】 王宜庭，电话:0511-85026750
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-11-15