[1]王园,戴昕吭,余婷,等.烧伤瘙痒问卷的汉化及信效度评价[J].军事护理,2022,39(11):1-4.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2022.11.001]
　WANG Yuan,DAI Xinhang,YU Ting,et al.Chinese Translation of the Burns Itch Questionnaire and Its Reliability and Validity Testing[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2022,39(11):1-4.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2022.11.001]
点击复制

烧伤瘙痒问卷的汉化及信效度评价
分享到：

《军事护理》[ISSN:2097-1826/CN:31-3186/R]

卷:
39
期数:
2022年11期
页码:
1-4
栏目:
工具研发专栏
出版日期:
2022-11-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Chinese Translation of the Burns Itch Questionnaire and Its Reliability and Validity Testing
文章编号:
2097-1826(2022)11-0001-04
作者:
王园; 戴昕吭; 余婷; 张德华; 熊婷婷; 冯苹
(海军军医大学第一附属医院 烧伤ICU，上海 200433)
Author(s):
WANG Yuan; DAI Xinhang; YU Ting; ZHANG Dehua; XIONG Tingting; FENG Ping
(Burn Intensive Care Unit,The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University,Shanghai 200433,China)
关键词:
烧伤瘙痒问卷;  信度;  效度;  汉化
Keywords:
burns itch questionnaire;  reliability;  validity;  Chinese translation
分类号:
R47; R823
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2022.11.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 汉化烧伤瘙痒问卷(burns itch questionnaire，BIQ)并进行信效度检验。方法 采用Brislin翻译模式汉化BIQ问卷并作语言调试，形成中文版BIQ，方便抽样法选取上海市、江苏省、河南省、广西省、浙江省11所烧伤中心110例烧伤患者进行瘙痒情况的调查并进行信效度检验。结果 中文版BIQ包含量性评估(10个条目，探索性因子分析提取3个公因子，即睡眠情况、日常生活质量、瘙痒程度，累积方差解释率87.037%，因子载荷值0.704～0.887。问卷总Cronbach's α系数为0.947; 重测信度为0.943; 总折半信度为0.915)及定性评估(对瘙痒情况评估的进一步补充和说明)两部分，共17个条目。结论 中文版BIQ信效度良好，可以作为量化评估工具应用于我国烧伤患者的瘙痒评估。
Abstract:
Objective To translate the Burns Itch Questionnaire(BIQ)into Chinese and test its reliability and validity.Methods The Brislin translation model was used to translate the BIQ into Chinese, with the expression adjusted to develop the Chinese version of BIQ.Convenient sampling was adopted to select 110 burn patients from 11 burn centers in Shanghai, Jiangsu, Henan, Guangxi and Zhejiang for investigation of their itch, and reliability and validity testing.Results The Chinese version of BIQ included quantitative and qualitative assessment, with a total of 17 items.The quantitative assessment contained 10 items.Three factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, which were sleeping disturbance, daily life disturbance, and itch severity, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 87.037%.The factor loading values were from 0.704 to 0.887.The total Cronbach's α coefficient, test-retest reliability, and split-half reliability were 0.947, 0.943, and 0.915, respectively.The qualitative assessment was the supplement and further explanation for the itch assessment.Conclusions The Chinese version of BIQ has good reliability and validity, which can be used as a quantitative tool to assess the itch of burn patients in China.

参考文献/References:

[1] CHUNG B Y,KIM H B,JUNG M J,et al.Post-Burn Pruritus[J].Int J Mol Sci,2020,21(11):3880.
[2] 黄涛,何升东,李先慧,等.326例烧伤患者瘢痕瘙痒情况的总结分析[J].西南国防医药,2019,29(7):749-751.
[3] 戴倩莹,郑若,梁银爱,等.烧伤病人创面瘙痒发生现状及与负性情绪的相关性分析[J].全科护理,2022,20(1):84-87.
[4] 刘晨阳,林于樱,朱威.瘙痒相关量表综述[J].实用皮肤病学杂志,2019,12(4):227-233.
[5] MORRIS V,MURPHY L M,ROSENBERG M,et al.Itch assessment scale for the pediatric burn survivor[J].J Burn Care Res.2012,33(3):419-424.
[6] VAN LOEY N E,HOFLFLAND H W,HENDRICKX H,et al.Validation of the burns itch questionnaire[J].Burns,2016,42(3):526-534.
[7] KUIPERS H C,BREMER M,BRAEM L,et al.Itch in burn areas after skin transplantation:patient characteristics,influencing factors and therapy[J].Acta Derm Venereol,2015,95(4):451-456.
[8] REICH A,BOZEK A,JANISZEWSKA K,et al.12-item pruritus severity scale: development and validation of new itch severity questionnaire[DB/OL]. [2022-07-02].https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5642880/.
[9] 王晓娇,夏海鸥.基于Brislin经典回译模型的新型翻译模型的构建及应用[J].护理学杂志,2016,31(7):61-63.
[10]李峥,刘宇.护理学研究方法[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:71-90.
[11]康婷婷,郑蔚,谷文燕,等.癌症患者养育忧虑问卷的汉化及信效度检验[J].解放军护理杂志,2021,38(11):33-36.
[12]吴明隆.问卷统计分析实务-SPSS操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2017:194-263.
[13]郭庆科.心理测验的原理与应用[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2002:82-89.
[14]孙婷婷,肖欢,吴密,等.ICU 后综合征问卷的汉化及信效度检验[J].护理研究,2022,36(5):892-895.
[15]刘欢,宁丽,张雯,等.患者结局评估态度问卷的汉化及信效度检验[J].解放军护理杂志,2019,36(2):1-5.
[16]王丽,陈琛,傅巧美,等.烧伤后创面瘙痒相关研究的进展[J].浙江医学,2020,42(11):1215-1218.
[17]乔亮,郇京宁.烧伤创面引起的相关问题治疗对策[J].中华护理杂志,2016,32(1):31-34.

相似文献/References:

[1]王思潼,叶志霞,李芸芸,等.中文版决策自我效能量表在原发性肝癌患者治疗决策中的信效度检验[J].军事护理,2021,38(01):37.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.01.010]
　WANG Sitong,YE Zhixia,LI Yunyun,et al.Reliability and Validity Testing of the Chinese Version of Decision Self-Efficacy Scale among Patients with Primary Liver Cancer for Treatment Decision-Making[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2021,38(11):37.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.01.010]
[2]陈思,赵世娣,杨小仙,等.中文版姑息性表现量表的信效度检验及应用研究[J].军事护理,2021,38(02):29.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.02.008]
　CHEN Si,ZHAO Shidi,YANG Xiaoxian,et al.Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Palliative Performance Scale(PPS) and Its Preliminary Application[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2021,38(11):29.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.02.008]
[3]魏文双,李沁梅,张敏,等.基于保护动机理论的结直肠癌筛查问卷的编制及信效度检验[J].军事护理,2021,38(05):29.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.05.008]
　WEI Wenshuang,LI Qinmei,ZHANG Min,et al.Construction of Colorectal Cancer Screening Questionnaire based on Protection Motivation Theory and Its Validity and Reliability Study[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2021,38(11):29.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.05.008]
[4]刘卉,黄菊,刘娟.乳腺癌患者心理弹性量表的汉化及信效度检验[J].军事护理,2021,38(06):27.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.06.007]
　LIU Hui,HUANG Ju,LIU Juan.Reliability and Validity Test of the Chinese Version of Breast Cancer Survivors Resilience Scale[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2021,38(11):27.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.06.007]
[5]胡惠菊,韩静,唐启群,等.跌倒警觉度量表在养老机构老年人中的信效度和最佳界值研究[J].军事护理,2021,38(07):33.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.07.008]
　HU Huiju,HAN Jing,TANG Qiqun,et al.Reliability and Validity of the Self-Awareness of Falls Scale in Elderly among Elderly in Nursing Homes and Its Best Cut off Value[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2021,38(11):33.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.07.008]
[6]高娅鑫,屈清荣,王碧轩,等.重返工作自我效能问卷的汉化及其在癌症患者中的信效度检验[J].军事护理,2021,38(07):52.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.07.013]
　GAO Yaxin,QU Qingrong,WANG Bixuan,et al.Chinese Translation of the Return-To-Work Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in Cancer Patients and Its Reliability and Validity Test[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2021,38(11):52.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.07.013]
[7]李佳镁,郭瑜洁,顾丽培,等.癌症患者重返工作适应性量表的编制及信效度检验[J].军事护理,2021,38(08):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.08.001]
　LI Jiamei,GUO Yujie,GU Lipei,et al.Assessment Scale for Cancer Patients' Adaptability of Returning to Work: Development and Validation of Reliability & Validity[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2021,38(11):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.08.001]
[8]王宇,刘东玮,周郁秋.成人精神障碍社区融合量表汉化修订及信效度校验[J].军事护理,2021,38(09):45.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.09.011]
　WANG Yu,LIU Dongwei,ZHOU Yuqiu.Revision and Psychometric Validation of the Chinese Version of Community Integration Scale for Adults with Psychiatric Disorders[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2021,38(11):45.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.09.011]
[9]胡韵,施逸雯,胡静超,等.跨专业职业素养评估量表的汉化和信效度研究[J].军事护理,2021,38(10):28.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.10.008]
　HU Yun,SHI Yiwen,HU Jingchao,et al.Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Interprofessional Professionalism Assessment[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2021,38(11):28.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.10.008]
[10]娄艺,郭胜斌,顾丽香,等.分娩态度量表的修订与信效度研究[J].军事护理,2021,38(11):29.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.11.008]
　LOU Yi,GUO Shengbin,GU Lixiang,et al.Revision and Psychometric Testing of Childbirth Attitudes Questionnaire[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2021,38(11):29.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.11.008]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【 收稿日期 】 2022-07-19 【 修回日期 】 2022-10-19
【 基金项目 】 上海市护理学会课题面上项目(2019MS-B16); 长海医院教学研究与改革项目重点项目(CHJG2020001)
【 作者简介 】 王园，本科，护师，从事危重烧伤护理工作
【 通信作者 】 冯苹，电话:021-31162619
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-11-15