[1]许芳兰,管顺芳,王英,等.改良胸腔引流方式在单孔胸腔镜下肺癌根治术后患者中的应用[J].解放军护理杂志,2021,38(05):82-85.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.05.022]
　XU Fanglan,GUAN Shunfang,WANG Ying,et al.Modified Pig Tail Drainage Catheter in Patients with Lung Cancer After Single-hole Thoracoscopic Radical Resection[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People’s Laberation Army,2021,38(05):82-85.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.05.022]
点击复制

改良胸腔引流方式在单孔胸腔镜下肺癌根治术后患者中的应用()
分享到：

《解放军护理杂志》[ISSN:2097-1826/CN:31-3186/R]

卷:
38
期数:
2021年05期
页码:
82-85
栏目:
专科护理
出版日期:
2021-05-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Modified Pig Tail Drainage Catheter in Patients with Lung Cancer After Single-hole Thoracoscopic Radical Resection
文章编号:
1008-9993(2021)05-0082-04
作者:
许芳兰1; 管顺芳1; 王英2; 马翠英1
1.苏州大学附属第二医院 胸心外科,江苏 苏州 215004; 2.苏州大学附属第二医院 护理部
Author(s):
XU Fanglan1; GUAN Shunfang1; WANG Ying2; MA Cuiying1
1.Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University,Suzhou 215004,Jiangsu Province,China; 2. Department of Nursing,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
关键词:
猪尾巴导管;  胸腔引流;  单孔胸腔镜;  肺癌根治术;  疼痛;  并发症
Keywords:
Pig tail catheter;  thoracic drainage;  single-hole thoracoscopic;  radical resection of lung cancer;  pain;  complication
分类号:
R473.6
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.05.022
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨改良胸腔引流方式在单孔胸腔镜下肺癌根治术后的应用效果。方法 便利抽样选取某院胸心外科2018年2月至2019年6月收治的单孔胸腔镜下肺癌根治术后患者100例,采用随机数表法分为观察组和对照组各50例。观察组采用猪尾巴导管于切口下2肋间置管后3M弹力胶布高举平台法固定,对照组采用传统24 FR胸腔引流管于单孔切口处置管并予缝线结扎固定,比较两组患者的临床疗效、疼痛程度、并发症发生率、引流效果及术后住院时间。结果 两组患者的临床疗效差异无统计学意义(P=0.755); 观察组患者的疼痛程度、肺不张及切口愈合不良的发生率低于对照组,引流管留置时间及术后住院时间短于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01)。结论 单孔胸腔镜下肺癌根治术后采用改良胸腔引流方式,不仅减轻了患者的疼痛,而且引流效果充分,降低了切口愈合不良、肺不张等并发症的发生率,有助于缩短住院时间,促进患者康复。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the effect of pig tail catheter drainage in lung cancer patient after single-hole thoracoscopic radical resection.Methods By convenience sampling method,100 patients with lung cancer who underwent single-hole thoracoscopic radical resection in our hospital from February 2018 to June 2019 were selected as the research subjects,and they were randomly divided into observation group and control group with 50 cases in each group.The observation group was treated with pig tail catheter placed in 2 intercostals under the incision,and then fixed with 3M elastic tape.The control group was treated with a traditional 24FR thoracic drainage tube in a single incision and fixed with suture ligation.The clinical efficacy,pain degree,complication rate,drainage effect and hospitalization time of the two groups were compared.Results There was no significant difference in the therapeutic effect between the two groups(P=0.755).The pain degree,atelectasis and the incidence of incision poor healing in the observation group were lower than those of the control group,and the retention time and hospitalization time of drainage tube were shorter than those of the control group(P<0.05 or P<0.01).Conclusions The application of modified pig tail drainage catheter after single-hole thoracoscopic lung cancer radical resection not only reduces the pain of patients,but also has sufficient drainage effect,reduces the incidence of complications such as poor wound healing and atelectasis,and helps to shorten the hospitalization time and promote the rehabilitation of patients.

参考文献/References:

[1] GAO S,LI N,WANG S,et al.Lung cancer in people’s republic of China[J].J Thorac Oncol,2020,15(10):1567-1576.
[2] GONZALEZ D,PARADELA M,GARCIA J,et al.Single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy[J].Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg,2011,12(3):514-515.
[3] SON B S,PARK J M,SEOK J P,et al.Modified incision and closure techniques for single-incision thoracoscopic lobectomy[J].Ann Thorac Surg,2015,99(1):349-351.
[4] 马晓璐,刘秀云.肺癌术后胸腔引流时间的影响因素分析[J].护士进修杂志,2017,32(5):435-438.
[5] 吴少珠,於雪英,刘燕飞.中心静脉导管胸腔闭式引流三种固定方法的效果比较[J].护士进修杂志,2016,31(24):2289-2290.
[6] 吴砚铭,车国卫.肺癌术后胸腔引流临床应用新进展[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2020,27(3):354-358.
[7] 马俊杰,高德军.不同管径胸腔引流管在肺叶切除术后的临床应用比较[J/OL].中华胸部外科电子杂志,2016,3(3):156-159.
[8] 杨佳妮,刘华华,丁晓芸,等.胸部手术成人患者围术期胸腔引流护理研究进展[J].护理学杂志,2019,34(21):103-106.
[9] 王晓龙,韩婉青,张锋,等.猪尾巴导管行胸腔闭式引流术在青少年首次自发性气胸中的临床应用[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2018,34(10):617-619.
[10]郭小川,向毅.猪尾巴管与深静脉导管在胸外科手术后胸腔积液引流治疗中的效果比较[J].实用医院临床杂志,2020,17(3):133-136.
[11]刘宏飞.采用3M弹力胶布高举平台固定腹腔引流管的护理效果[J].中外医学研究,2018,16(11):100-101.
[12]罗江敏,米元元,许子霞,等.开胸术后病人疼痛评估的证据总结[J].护理研究,2019,33(23):4150-4155.
[13]刘武新,马海涛,黄海涛.单操作孔胸腔镜肺癌根治术后不同胸腔引流效果分析[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2019,35(9):515-519.
[14]中华医学会胸心血管外科学分会胸腔镜外科学组,中国医师协会胸外科医师分会微创外科专家委员会.中国胸外科围手术期疼痛管理专家共识(2018版)[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2018,25(11):921-928.
[15]王天佑,胸外科围手术期肺保护中国专家共识(版)专家组,中国医学基金会胸外科专业委员会.胸外科围手术期肺保护中国专家共识(2019版)[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2019,26(9):835-842.
[16]杨劼,古卫权,叶俊,等.全胸腔镜肺叶切除术后放置粗、细胸腔闭式引流管的比较[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2014,30(9):568-571.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【 收稿日期 】 2021-01-04 【 修回日期 】 2021-04-14
【 基金项目 】 国家自然科学基金(81802989)
【 作者简介 】 许芳兰,本科,主管护师,主要研究方向为胸心外科临床护理
【 通讯作者 】 马翠英,电话:0512-67783809
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-05-15