[1]王思潼,叶志霞,李芸芸,等.中文版决策自我效能量表在原发性肝癌患者治疗决策中的信效度检验[J].军事护理,2021,38(01):37-40.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.01.010]
 WANG Sitong,YE Zhixia,LI Yunyun,et al.Reliability and Validity Testing of the Chinese Version of Decision Self-Efficacy Scale among Patients with Primary Liver Cancer for Treatment Decision-Making[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2021,38(01):37-40.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.01.010]
点击复制

中文版决策自我效能量表在原发性肝癌患者治疗决策中的信效度检验
分享到:

《军事护理》[ISSN:2097-1826/CN:31-3186/R]

卷:
38
期数:
2021年01期
页码:
37-40
栏目:
研究荟萃
出版日期:
2021-01-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Reliability and Validity Testing of the Chinese Version of Decision Self-Efficacy Scale among Patients with Primary Liver Cancer for Treatment Decision-Making
文章编号:
1008-9993(2021)01-0037-05
作者:
王思潼叶志霞李芸芸刘芳李丽
(海军军医大学第三附属医院 护理处,上海 201805)
Author(s):
WANG SitongYE ZhixiaLI YunyunLIU FangLI Li
(Department of Nursing,Third Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University,Shanghai 201805,China)
关键词:
原发性肝癌 决策自我效能量表 信度 效度
Keywords:
primary liver cancer decision self-efficacy scale reliability validity
分类号:
R473.57
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.01.010
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 对决策自我效能量表汉化,并通过在原发性肝癌患者决策中的应用进行信效度检验,以评价该量表在我国癌症患者治疗决策领域应用的可行性。方法 按照Brislin量表汉化原则,对量表进行翻译、回译和跨文化调适。采用便利抽样法选取150名原发性肝癌住院患者为研究对象,检验中文版决策自我效能量表的信效度。结果 中文版决策自我效能量表共11个条目,因子分析提取1个公因子,累计贡献率55.073%; 量表内容效度指数为0.966; Cronbach's α系数为0.918,Guttman折半系数为0.876,各条目得分与总分的相关系数为0.627~0.796(均P<0.01),验证性因子分析显示量表的模型拟合较好。结论 中文版决策自我效能量表具有良好的信效度,可作为我国评价目标人群参与治疗决策时自我效能水平的有效工具。
Abstract:
Objective To cross-culturally adapt the original English version of Decision Self-Efficacy Scale,and test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version scale in the decision-making process of patients with primary liver cancer(PLC),so as to evaluate the feasibility of the Chinese version scale in cancer patients' treatement decision-making in China.Methods The English version of Decision Self-Efficacy Scale was translated into Chinese,back translated and cross-culturally adapted according to the Brislin's principles.The reliability and validity of the Chinese version scale were tested among a population of 150 PLC inpatients,who were selected using convenient sampling.Results The Chinese version of Decision Self-Efficacy Scale consisted of 11 items.One common factor was extracted using factor analysis,with the cumulative contribution rate to be 55.073%.The content validity index of the Chinese version scale was 0.966.The Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.918 and the Guttmann split-half reliability coefficient was 0.876.The correlation coefficients between the scores of each item and the total score were 0.627-0.796(all P<0.01).Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model fit of the Chinese version scale was good.Conclusions The Chinese version of Decision Self-Efficacy Scale has good reliability and validity.It can be used as an effective tool to evaluate the level of self-efficacy in treatment decision-making among targeted population in China.

参考文献/References:

[1] BUNN H,O'CONNOR A.Validation of client decision-making instruments in the context of psychiatry[J].Can J Nurs Res,1996,28(3):13-27.
[2] BAILEY R A,SHILLINGTON A C,HARSHAW Q,et al.Changing patients' treatment preferences and values with a decision aid for type2 diabetes mellitus:results from the treatment arm of a randomized controlled trial[J].Diabetes Ther,2018,9(2):803-814.
[3] SHEPHERD S C,HACKING B,WALLACE L M,et al.Randomised controlled trial of a repeated consultation support intervention for patients with colorectal cancer[J].Psychooncology,2019,28(4):702-709.
[4] CHEN N H,LIN Y P,LIANG S Y,et al.Conflict when making decisions about dialysis modality[J].J Clin Nurs,2018,27(1-2):e138-e146.
[5] O'BRIEN M,CRICKARD E,LEE J,et al.Attitudes and experience of youth and their parents with psychiatric medication and relationship to self-reported adherence[J].Commu Ment Health J,2013,49(5):567-575.
[6] 朱慧,张丹妮,金孔军,等.恐动症成因分析量表的汉化及信效度检验[J].解放军护理杂志,2020,37(1):1-4.
[7] OWENS O L,WOOTEN N R,TAVAKOLI A S.Adaptation and initial psychometric evaluation of an informed prostate cancer screening decision self-efficacy scale for African-American men[J].J Racial Ethn Health Disparities,2020,7(4):746-759.
[8] EUN-SEOK C,KEVIN H K,JUDITH A E.Translation of scales in cross-cultural research:issues and techniques[J].J Adv Nurs,2007,58(4):386-395.
[9] 周兆丁,吕锟,沈瑾,等.统计软件SPSS相关分析及应用[J].电脑知识与技术,2019,20:301-302.
[10]American Cancer Society.Prostate cancer:early detection.Atlanta,GA.2013.[2020-03-18].http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/cid/documents/webcontent/003182-pdf.
[11]MULLEN P D,ALLEN J D,GLANZ K,et al.Measures used in studies of informed decision making about cancer screening:a systematic review[J].Ann Behav Med,2006,32(3):188-201.
[12]DY S M.Instruments for evaluating shared medical decision making:a structured literature review[J].Med Care Res Rev,2007,64(6):623-649.
[13]LONGTIN Y,SAX H,LEAPE L,et al.Patient participation:current knowledge and applicability to patient safety[J].Mayo Clin Proc,2010,85(1):53-62.
[14]LEGARE F,THOMPSON-LEDUC P.Twelve myths about shared decision making[J].Patient Educ Couns,2014,96(3):281-286.
[15]马丽莉,何仲.癌症病人参与治疗、护理决策的现状研究[J].中国实用护理杂志,2005,21(6):10-12.
[16]徐小琳,毛捷,王继龙,等.患者参与医疗决策期望量表的编制策略及条目筛选[J].中国当代医药,2012,19(18):162-164.
[17]李玉,叶志霞,刘佩玉,等.癌症患者治疗决策辅助的研究进展[J].中华护理杂志,2017,52(1):28-33.
[18]王露,陈英,崔金锐,等.中文版决策冲突量表在直肠癌患者术式决策中应用的信效度检验[J].护理学杂志,2019,3:31-35.
[19]陈芳,程晓姣.中文版决策后悔量表应用于面部美容受术者的信效度评价[J].护理学报,2018,25(7):42-44.
[20]徐小琳.患者对医疗决策参与的满意度量表的编制及信效度考评[D].长沙:中南大学2010.
(本文编辑:陈晓英)

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【 收稿日期 】 2020-09-12 【 修回日期 】 2020-11-17
【 作者简介 】 王思潼,硕士在读,护师,研究方向:癌症患者治疗决策
【 通讯作者 】 李丽,电话:13817382212
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-01-15