[1]张杰,陈慧敏,付勤.创伤性脑损伤住院患儿主要照顾者负担及其影响因素[J].军事护理,2022,39(06):48-51.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2022.06.012]
 ZHANG Jie,CHEN Huimin,FU Qin.Burden of Main Caregivers of Hospitalized Children with Traumatic Brain Injury and Its Influencing Factors[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2022,39(06):48-51.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2022.06.012]
点击复制

创伤性脑损伤住院患儿主要照顾者负担及其影响因素
分享到:

《军事护理》[ISSN:2097-1826/CN:31-3186/R]

卷:
39
期数:
2022年06期
页码:
48-51
栏目:
研究荟萃
出版日期:
2022-06-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Burden of Main Caregivers of Hospitalized Children with Traumatic Brain Injury and Its Influencing Factors
文章编号:
1008-9993(2022)06-0048-04
作者:
张杰1陈慧敏1付勤2
(1.深圳市儿童医院 神经外科,广东 深圳 518030; 2.深圳市儿童医院 护理部)
Author(s):
ZHANG Jie1CHEN Huimin1FU Qin2
(1.Department of Neurosurgery,Shenzhen Children's Hospital,Shenzhen 518030,Guangdong Province,China; 2.Department of Nursing,Shenzhen Children's Hospital)
关键词:
创伤性脑损伤 患儿 照顾者 负担 影响因素
Keywords:
traumatic brain injury child patient caregivers burden influencing factors
分类号:
R473.72
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2022.06.012
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 调查创伤性脑损伤(traumatic brain injury,TBI)住院患儿的主要照顾者负担现状并分析影响因素,为开展相关干预提供参考。方法 2020年4月至2021年5月,采用便利抽样选取深圳市某三级甲等儿童医院神经外科TBI住院患儿的主要照顾者128例为研究对象,采用一般情况调查表、Zarit照顾者负担量表(Zarit caregiver burden interview,ZBI)、简易应对方式问卷(simplified coping style questionnaire,SCSQ)对其进行调查,分析负担的影响因素。结果 TBI住院患儿的主要照顾者ZBI得分为31.5(24.00,40.75)分。SCSQ中积极和消极应对维度均分分别为(23.30±5.55)和(10.04±4.64)分。TBI住院患儿的主要照顾者Ln ZBI评分在患儿TBI分类、住院天数、有无后遗症、有无入住ICU、照顾者学历及月均收入上的差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。入住ICU、消极应对、有后遗症、月均收入为TBI住院患儿的主要照顾者负担的影响因素(均P<0.05)。结论 住院TBI患儿主要照顾者负担处于中度,应重点关注入住ICU、消极应对、有后遗症和家庭收入低的群体。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the burden of main caregivers during hospitalization of children with traumatic brain injury(TBI)and analyze its influencing factors,so as to provide reference for relevant intervention.Methods From April 2020 to May 2021,128 main caregivers of children with TBI who were hospitalized in the department of neurosurgery of a tertiary A children's hospital in Shenzhen were selected by convenience sampling method.Questionnaire surveys were conducted with the general questionnaire,Zarit caregiver burden interview(ZBI)and simplified coping style questionnaire(SCSQ)to analyze the influencing factors.Results The ZBI score of main caregivers was 31.5(24.00, 40.75).The scores of positive and negative coping styles in SCSQ were(23.30±5.55)and(10.04±4.64)respectively.Ln ZBI scores of the main caregivers of hospitalized children with TBI showed statistically significant differences in TBI classification,length of stay, sequelae,intensive care unit(ICU)admission,educational background and monthly income of caregivers(all P<0.05).Conclusions The burden of main caregivers of hospitalized TBI children is of moderate level,and special attention should be given to the families with ICU admission,negative coping style,sequelae and low monthly household income.

参考文献/References:

[1] LI Y,CHEN F,ZHANG J,et al.Epidemiological characteristics of Chinese paediatric traumatic brain injury inpatients[J].Brain Inj,2017,31(8):1094-1101.
[2] EMERY C A,BARLOW K M,BROOKS B L,et al.A systematic review of psychiatric, psychological, and behavioural outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury in children and adolescents[J].Can J Psychiatry,2016,61(5):259-269.
[3] NARAD M E,TREBLE-BARNA A,PEUGH J,et al.Recovery trajectories of executive functioning after pediatric TBI:a latent class growth modeling analysis[J].J Head Trauma Rehabil,2017,32(2):98-106.
[4] LABRELL F,CAMARA-COSTA H,DUFOUR C,et al.Parental stress and paediatric acquired brain injury[J].Brain Inj, 2018,32(13-14):1780-1786.
[5] 宋明阳,周兰姝.先天性心脏病患儿照顾者负担现状及影响因素[J].2018,35(3):17-20.
[6] TEO J H,CHONG S L,CHIANG L W,et al.Cost of inpatient rehabilitation for children with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury[J].Ann Acad Med Singap, 2021,50(1):26-32.
[7] 王烈,杨小湜,侯哲,等.护理者负担量表中文版的应用与评价[J].中国公共卫生,2006,22(8):970-972.
[8] 赵彤,李佳祺,邢凤梅.老年人配偶照顾负担的现状调查及影响因素分析[J].护理研究,2021,35(5):921-923.
[9] 解亚宁.简易应对方式量表信度和效度的初步研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,1998,6(2):53-54.
[10]姚蓉,雷丽梅,杨婷,等.结核病住院患儿家庭照顾者的照顾负担与焦虑现状及其相关性分析[J].,2021,38(10):32-35.
[11]任贵娥,范慧芳,马青,等.颅内动脉瘤病人照顾者照顾负担水平及影响因素研究[J].护理研究,2021,35(22):4100-4105.
[12]BEAUCHAMP M H,SEGUIN M,GAGNER C,et al.The PARENT model:a pathway approach for understanding parents' role after early childhood mild traumatic brain injury[J].Clin Neuropsychol,2020,35(5):846-867.
[13]邵鹏,胡少华.儿科重症监护室意外伤害儿童父母真实体验的质性研究[J].2021,38(12):49-52.
[14]KIRK S,FALLON D,FRASER C,et al.Supporting parents following childhood traumatic brain injury:a qualitative study to examine information and emotional support needs across key care transitions[J].Child Care Health Dev,2015,41(2):303-313.
[15]侯晓梅.家庭赋权干预对肠造口患儿照顾者自我效能、应对方式及心理状态的影响[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2021,29(3):334-338.
[16]齐素红,董梅.儿科慢性疾病患儿主要照顾者照顾负担的研究现状[J].天津护理,2020,28(2):244-247.
[17]赵静维,甘雯,宋勉,等.支气管哮喘患儿家庭照顾者负担与应对方式的相关性分析[J].中华现代护理杂志,2020,26(34):4839-4842.
[18]王璟,岳树锦,张润节,等.大肠癌患者家庭照顾者因素对其照顾负担影响的纵向研究[J].中国护理管理,2021,21(8):1250-1256.
[19]SELINER B,LATAL B,SPIRIG R.When children with profound multiple disabilities are hospitalized:a cross-sectional survey of parental burden of care, quality of life of parents and their hospitalized children, and satisfaction with family-centered care[J].J Spec Pediatr Nurs,2016,21(3):147-157.
[20]中国康复医学会康复护理专业委员会.颅脑创伤临床康复护理策略专家共识[J].护理学杂志,2016,31(18):1-6.
[21]苗苗,吴宁宁,张晓辉,等.先天性心脏病手术患儿照顾者负担现状及影响因素分析[J].中国护理管理,2019,19(7):1011-1016.
[22]HOLLAND J N,SCHMIDT A T.Static and dynamic factors promoting resilience following traumatic brain injury:a brief review[J].Neural Plast,2015,12(3):902-911.

相似文献/References:

[1]田静,王莹,方艳艳,等.颅脑创伤患者肢体功能锻炼的最佳证据总结[J].军事护理,2022,39(12):75.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2022.12.019]
 TIAN Jing,WANG Ying,FANG Yanyan,et al.Summary of the Best Evidence for Functional Exercise of Limbs in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2022,39(06):75.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2022.12.019]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【 收稿日期 】 2021-06-29 【 修回日期 】 2022-03-09
【 基金项目 】 深圳市科创委基础研究面上项目(JCYJ201908 09173611515)
【 作者简介 】 张杰,硕士在读,护师,从事儿科护理
【 通信作者 】 付勤,电话:0755-83009823
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-06-15