[1]陈思,赵世娣,杨小仙,等.中文版姑息性表现量表的信效度检验及应用研究[J].军事护理,2021,38(02):29-32.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.02.008]
　CHEN Si,ZHAO Shidi,YANG Xiaoxian,et al.Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Palliative Performance Scale(PPS) and Its Preliminary Application[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2021,38(02):29-32.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.02.008]
点击复制

中文版姑息性表现量表的信效度检验及应用研究
分享到：

《军事护理》[ISSN:2097-1826/CN:31-3186/R]

卷:
38
期数:
2021年02期
页码:
29-32
栏目:
研究荟萃
出版日期:
2021-02-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Palliative Performance Scale(PPS) and Its Preliminary Application
文章编号:
1008-9993(2021)02-0029-04
作者:
陈思1; 2; 赵世娣3; 杨小仙2; 杨梦雪2; 潘生强2; 俞玮2; 费朝廷1; 张伟1
(1.江苏大学医学院 护理系,江苏 镇江 212000; 2.无锡太湖学院 健康与护理学院,江苏 无锡 214000; 3.无锡市第二人民医院 肿瘤科,江苏 无锡 214000)
Author(s):
CHEN Si1; 2; ZHAO Shidi3; YANG Xiaoxian2; YANG Mengxue2; PAN Shengqiang2; YU Wei2; FEI Chaoting1; ZHANG Wei1
(1.Department of Nursing,School of Medicine,Jiangsu University,Zhenjiang 212000,Jiangsu Province,China; 2.School of Nursing and Healthcare,Wuxi Taihu College,Wuxi 214000,Jiangsu Province,China; 3.Department of Oncology,the Second People Hospital of Wuxi,Wuxi 214000,Jiangsu Province,China)
关键词:
中文版姑息性表现量表;  癌症晚期患者;  生存期预测;  信度;  效度
Keywords:
the Chinese Version of Palliative Performance Scale;  patients with advanced cancer;  predicting the survival time of patients;  reliability;  validity
分类号:
R473
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.02.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 汉化姑息性表现量表(palliative performance scale,PPS)并检验其信效度,分析PPS评分与癌症晚期患者生存期的关系。方法 对PPS原量表进行翻译、回译、跨文化调试,使用中文版 PPS对某三级甲等医院190例癌症晚期患者进行评分,以评价量表的信效度; 采用 Kaplan-Meier方法对癌症晚期患者生存期进行描述。结果 中文版PPS条目水平的内容效度指数为0.833～1.000,量表水平的平均内容效度指数为0.967; 各条目因子载荷均在0.861及以上; 各条目与整体相关性系数为0.752～0.960,均呈正相关(均P<0.01); 校标关联效度为0.921(P<0.01); Cronbach's α系数为0.966; 重测信度为0.953。190例患者的平均生存时间为(63.902±7.505)d,中位生存时间为24 d(95%CI20.060～27.940)。结论 中文版PPS具有较好的信效度,可作为癌症晚期患者的生存期预测工具。
Abstract:
Objective To translate Palliative Performance Scale(PPS)into Chinese and verify its reliability and validity.Analyze the relationship between the PPS score and the survival time of advanced cancer patients.Methods Translation,back translation and culturally adaptation of PPS were performed to construct the Chinese version of PPS.Then the Chinese version of PPS was used to assess 190 advanced cancer patients from a tertiary A hospital for the evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of PPS.The Kaplan-Meier method was used to describe the survival time of patients with advanced cancer.Results The item level content validity index(I-CVI)of the Chinese version of PPS was from 0.833 to 1.000,and the average scale-level content validity index(S-CVI/Ave)was 0.967.The range of factors loading was 0.861 and above.The Pearson correlation coefficients which ranged from 0.752 to 0.960 between the scores of PPS and each item,which showed significantly positive correlation(all P<0.01).The Pearson correlation coefficient between PPS and KPS was 0.921(P<0.01).The Cronbach's α co-efficient of the Chinese version of PPS was 0.966 and the retest reliability was 0.953.The average survival time of 190 patients was 63.902±7.505 days,and the median survival time was 24 days(95% CI 20.060～27.940).Conclusions The Chinese version of PPS has good reliability and validity.It can be used as a tool to predict the survival time of patients with advanced cancer.

参考文献/References:

[1] 孙冬冬.基于多模态数据融合的乳腺癌生存期预测研究[D].合肥:中国科学技术大学,2018.
[2] ANDERSON F G,DOWNING G M,HILL J,et al.Palliative performance scale(PPS):a new tool[J].J Palliat Care,1996,12(1):5-11.
[3] VIRIK K,GLARE P.Validation of the palliative performance scale for inpatients admitted to a palliative care unit in Sydney,Australia[J].J Pain Symptom Manage,2002,23(6):455-457.
[4] HARROLD J,RICKERSON E,CARROLL J T,et al.Is the palliative performance scale a useful predictor of mortality in a heterogeneous hospice population?[J].J Palliat Med,2005,8(3):503-509.
[5] BAIK D,RUSSELL D,JORDAN L,et al.Using the palliative performance scale to estimate survival for patients at the end of life: a systematic review of the literature[J].J Palliat Med,2018,2018,21(11):1651-1661.
[6] KASMANN L,JANSSEN S,SCHILD S E,et al.Karnosky performance score and radiation dose predict survival of patients re-irradiated for a locoregional recurrence of small cell lung cancer[J].Anticancer Res,2016,36(2):803-805.
[7] LAU F,DOWNING G M,LESPERANCE M,et al.Use of palliative performance scale in end-of-life prognostication[J].J Palliat Med,2006,9(5):1066-1075.
[8] BRISLIN R W.Back-translation for cross-cultural research[J].J Cross Cult Psychol,1970,1(3):185-216.
[9] CHEWASKULYONG B,SAPINUN L,DOWNING G M,et al.Reliability and validity of the Thai translation(Thai PPS adult suandok)of the palliative performance scale(PPSv2)[J].Palliat Med,2012,26(8):1034-1041.
[10]LOU S,CARSTENSEN K,JORGENSEN C R,et al.Stroke patients' and informal carers' experiences with life after stroke:an overview of qualitative systematic reviews[J].Disabil Rehabil,2017,39(3):301-313.
(本文编辑:郁晓路)

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【 收稿日期 】 2020-06-02 【 修回日期 】 2020-10-12
【 基金项目 】 无锡市科协2019年度160项重点软课题(KX-19-B29)
【 作者简介 】 陈思,硕士,助理实验师,从事护理教育工作
【 通讯作者 】 张伟,电话:13805285330
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-02-15