[1]郭慧琦,沈蕴之,施海明,等.医护人员心脏康复推荐决策行为的障碍因素分析:基于能力、机会、动机-行动模型和理论域框架的质性研究[J].军事护理,2023,40(12):60-63.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2023.12.015]
 GUO Huiqi,SHEN Yunzhi,SHI Haiming,et al.Analysis of Obstacles to Decision-making Behavior of Cardiac Rehabilitation Recommendation Among Medical Staff: A Qualitative Study Based on COM-B Model and Theoretical Domain Framework[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2023,40(12):60-63.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2023.12.015]
点击复制

医护人员心脏康复推荐决策行为的障碍因素分析:基于能力、机会、动机-行动模型和理论域框架的质性研究
分享到:

《军事护理》[ISSN:2097-1826/CN:31-3186/R]

卷:
40
期数:
2023年12期
页码:
60-63
栏目:
研究荟萃
出版日期:
2023-12-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of Obstacles to Decision-making Behavior of Cardiac Rehabilitation Recommendation Among Medical Staff: A Qualitative Study Based on COM-B Model and Theoretical Domain Framework
文章编号:
2097-1826(2023)12-0060-04
作者:
郭慧琦1沈蕴之1施海明1王宜青1李勇1孙笑天1卢慧娟2
(1.复旦大学附属华山医院 心血管科,上海 200000; 2.复旦大学 护理学院,上海 200000)
Author(s):
GUO Huiqi1SHEN Yunzhi1SHI Haiming1WANG Yiqing1LI Yong1SUN Xiaotian1LU Huijuan2
(1.Department of Cardiovascular,Huashan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University,Shanghai 200000,China; 2.School of Nursing,Fudan University,Shanghai 200000,China)
关键词:
心脏康复 治疗决策 能力、机会、动机-行动模型
Keywords:
cardiac rehabilitation treatment decision Capability Opportunity Motivation-Behavior model
分类号:
R473.54
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2023.12.015
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨阻碍医护人员推荐心脏康复决策行为发生的原因。方法 基于能力、机会、动机-行动模型(capability opportunity motivation-behavior model,COM-B)和理论域框架(theoretical domains framework,TDF)制定访谈提纲,选取25名医护人员进行半结构访谈,访谈资料以COM-B和TDF为编码框架,采用归纳主题法和演绎框架法分析。结果 医护人员心脏康复推荐决策行为的障碍因素包括医护人员缺乏推荐心脏康复的意愿和医护人员缺乏推荐心脏康复的行动策略,前者分析得出缺乏目的理解、缺乏信念支持、缺乏专业团队、不良经历、消极态度和缺乏社会环境支持6个主题; 后者分析得出缺乏物质资源、缺乏知识和能力2个主题。结论 医护人员心脏康复推荐决策行为发生的障碍因素影响其向患者推荐心脏康复的意愿和行动策略。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the factors that hinder the decision-making behavior of medical staff on recommending cardiac rehabilitation.Methods An interview outline was developed based on the Capability Opportunity Motivation-Behavior model(COM-B model)and Theoretical Domains Framework(TDF),with 25 medical staff selected for semi-structured interviews.The interview data used COM-B and TDF as the coding framework,and the inductive topic analysis and deductive framework analysis were also used.Results The decision-making behavior of medical staff for recommending cardiac rehabilitation consisted of two parts:their unwillingness and lack of strategies to recommend cardiac rehabilitation.The former was attributed to not only a lack of understanding of the purpose,belief and professional team,but also adverse experiences,negative attitude and lack of support from the society,while the latter was due to a lack of material resources,knowledge and ability.Conclusions The obstacles to the decision-making behavior of medical staff for cardiac rehabilitation recommendation are the lack of willingness and strategies for action.

参考文献/References:

[1] AI QUAIT A,DOHERTY P,GUTACKER N,et al.In the modern era of percutaneous coronary intervention:is cardiac rehabilitation engagement purely a patient or a service level decision?[J].Eur J Pre Cardiol,2017,24(13):1351-1357.
[2] SHIELDS G E,WELLS A,DOHERTY P,et al.Cost-effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review[J].Heart,2018,104(17):1403-1410.
[3] JANSEN J P,TRIKALINOS T,CAPPELLERI J C,et al.Indirect treatment comparison/network Meta-analysis study questionnaire to assess relevance and credibility to inform health care decision making: an ISPOR-AMCP-NPC good practice task force report[J].Value Health,2014,17(2):157-173.
[4] 谢梦珂,杨巧芳,阙静,等.心房颤动患者参与抗凝治疗决策冲突的质性研究[J].解放军护理杂志,2020,37(12):18-21.
[5] MICHIE S,VAN STRALEN M M,WEST R.The behaviour change wheel:a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions[J/OL].[2023-07-30].https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3096582/.DOI:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.
[6] ATKINS L,FRANCIS J,ISLAM R,et al.A guide to using the theoretical domains framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems[J/OL].[2023-07-30].https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5480145/.DOI:10.1186/s13012-017-0605-9.
[7] MICHIE S,JOHNSTON M,ABRAHAM C,et al.Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach[J].Qual Saf in Health Care,2005,14(1):26-33.
[8] CANE J,O'CONNOR D,MICHIE S.Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research[J/OL].[2023-07-30].https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3483008/.DOI:10.1186/1748-5908-7-37.
[9] RITCHIE J,LEWIS J,NICHOLLS C M.Qualitative research practice:a guide for social science students and researchers[M].London: Sage publications Ltd:2003:407-409.
[10]SCOTT L B,ALLEN J K.Providers' perceptions of factors affecting women's referral to outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programs: an exploratory study[J].J Cardiopulm Rehabil,2004,24(6):387-391.
[11]GRACE S L,EVINDAR A,ABRAMSON B L,et al.Physician management preferences for cardiac patients:factors affecting referral to cardiac rehabilitation[J].Can J Cardiol,2004,20(11):1101-1107.
[12]DAW P,WITHERS T M,VAN ZANTEN J J C S V,et al.A systematic review of provider-and system-level factors influencing the delivery of cardiac rehabilitation for heart failure[J/OL].[2023-07-30].https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8611948/.DOI:10.1186/s12913-021-07174-w.
[13]ANDERSEN J H,BURNS K,GUASSORA A D K,et al.Taking no for an answer.Nurses' consultations with people with cardiac disease about rehabilitation:a qualitative study[J/OL].[2023-07-30].https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089718972100 0033?via%3Dihub.DOI:10.1016/j.apnr.2021.151397.
[14]WHITTAKER E M,LEVY A R,MATATA B,et al.Using behavior change interventions in cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation: perspectives from healthcare professionals in the United Kingdom[J/OL].[2023-07-30].https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8872220/.DOI:10.3390/ijerph19041980.

相似文献/References:

[1]高莹莹,贺婷,王培席,等.心脏运动康复的发展现状及影响因素的研究进展[J].军事护理,2021,38(04):86.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.04.023]
[2]肖霖,黄重梅,方庆虹,等.基于扎根理论的癌症患者关系性自主治疗决策行为理论框架的构建研究[J].军事护理,2022,39(07):66.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2022.07.017]
 XIAO Lin,HUANG Chongmei,FANG Qinghong,et al.Construction of the Theoretical Framework of Relational Autonomy Treatment Decision-Making Behaviors Among Cancer Patients: A Grounded Theory Study[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2022,39(12):66.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2022.07.017]
[3]肖霖,吴秀梅,彭美芳,等.癌症患者参与治疗决策测评量表的编制及信效度检验[J].军事护理,2022,39(11):9.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2022.11.003]
 XIAO Lin,WU Xiumei,PENG Meifang,et al.Development of Cancer Patient's Involvement in Treatment Decision-Making Scale and Its Reliability and Validity Testing[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2022,39(12):9.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2022.11.003]
[4]王贝贝,杨艳,杨林宁,等.局限性前列腺癌患者治疗决策过程体验及个人偏好的质性研究[J].军事护理,2023,40(10):47.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2023.10.012]
 WANG Beibei,YANG Yan,YANG Linning,et al.Treatment Decision-making Process Experiences and Personal Preferences of Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer: A Qualitative Study[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2023,40(12):47.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2023.10.012]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2023-08-21【修回日期】2023-11-12
【基金项目】复旦大学复星护理科研项目(FNF202069)
【作者简介】郭慧琦,本科,主管护师,电话:021-52887060
【通信作者】沈蕴之,电话:021-52887060
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-12-15