[1]江丹丹,丁亚囡,金小红,等.子痫前期患者阴道试产失败风险预测模型的构建与验证[J].军事护理,2023,40(11):40-44.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2023.11.010]
　JIANG Dandan,DING Yanan,JIN Xiaohong,et al.Construction of a Risk Prediction Model for Vaginal Trial Failure in Preeclampsia Patients and Its Validation Test[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2023,40(11):40-44.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2023.11.010]
点击复制

子痫前期患者阴道试产失败风险预测模型的构建与验证
分享到：

《军事护理》[ISSN:2097-1826/CN:31-3186/R]

卷:
40
期数:
2023年11期
页码:
40-44
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2023-11-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Construction of a Risk Prediction Model for Vaginal Trial Failure in Preeclampsia Patients and Its Validation Test
文章编号:
2097-1826(2023)11-0040-05
作者:
江丹丹; 丁亚囡; 金小红; 冯丽萍; 徐云钊
(南通大学附属医院 产科,江苏 南通226000)
Author(s):
JIANG Dandan; DING Yanan; JIN Xiaohong; FENG Liping; XU Yunzhao
(Department of Obstetrics,Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University,Nantong 226000,Jiangsu Province,China)
关键词:
子痫前期;  阴道试产;  影响因素;  预测模型
Keywords:
preeclampsia;  vaginal trial;  influencing factors;  prediction model
分类号:
R473.71
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2023.11.010
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 构建子痫前期(preeclampsia,PE)患者阴道试产失败风险预测模型,以期为护理人员提供PE患者阴道试产失败风险筛查工具。方法 采用便利抽样法,选取2018年2月至2023年4月在我院阴道试产的269例PE患者为研究对象。对纳入患者随机抽取70%作为建模集(188例),剩余30%作为验证集(81例)。在建模集中采用单因素分析和多因素Logistic回归分析PE患者阴道试产失败的影响因素并建立预测模型。模型效能采用受试者工作特征曲线(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)和拟合优度、决策曲线评估。结果 年龄、试产前体质量指数、产前胎儿脐动脉血流收缩期/舒张期峰值流速的比值、医院焦虑抑郁评分是PE患者阴道试产失败的危险因素(均P<0.05),Bishop评分为保护因素(P<0.05)。构建预测模型的ROC曲线下面积为0.908,拟合优度检验的χ2=2.743,P=0.318。模型在验证集测试的ROC曲线下面积0.872,拟合优度仍良好(χ2=2.194,P=0.335)。决策曲线分析表明风险阈值>0.38时,此预测模型可提供显著额外的临床净收益。结论 构建的预测模型可作为预防PE患者阴道试产发生失败措施的参考依据,值得推广。
Abstract:
Objective To construct a risk prediction model for vaginal trial failure in patients with preeclampsia(PE),in order to provide nursing staff with a risk screening tool for vaginal trial failure in PE patients.Methods Adopting convenience sampling method,269 PE patients who underwent vaginal trials in our hospital from February 2018 to April 2023 were selected as the research subjects.70% of the included patients were randomly selected as the modeling set(188 cases),and the remaining 30% as the validation set(81 cases).Single factor analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used in the modeling set to analyze the influencing factors of vaginal trial failure in PE patients and establish a predictive model.The model effectiveness was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curves,goodness of fit,and decision curves.Results Age,preoperative body mass index,ratio of peak systolic/diastolic flow velocity of fetal umbilical artery blood flow,and hospital anxiety and depression score are risk factors for vaginal trial failure in PE patients(all P<0.05).The Bishop score is a protective factor(P<0.05).The area under the receiver operating characteristic of the prediction model is 0.908,goodness of fit test χ2=2.743,P=0.318.The area of the model under the receiver operating characteristic of the validation set test is 0.872,goodness of fit test χ2=2.743,P=0.318.When the decision curve analysis shows that the risk threshold is greater than 0.38,this predictive model can provide significant additional clinical net benefits.Conclusions The prediction model constructed can serve as a reference for effective measures to prevent vaginal trial failure in PE patients,and is worth promoting.

参考文献/References:

[1] 叶云贞,周琼洁,肖喜荣,等.子痫前期预测和预防的研究进展[J].四川大学学报:医学版,2022,53(6):1012-1015.
[2] BROEKHUIJSEN K,VAN BAAREN G J,VAN PAMPUS M G,et al.Immediate delivery versus expectant monitoring for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy between 34 and 37 weeks of gestation(HYPITAT-II):an open-label,randomised controlled trial [J].Lancet,2015,385(9986):2492-2501.
[3] PRETSCHER J,WEISS C,DAMMER U,et al.Influence of preeclampsia on induction of labor at term:a cohort study[J].In Vivo,2020,34(3):1195-1200.
[4] 孙雯,王晓怡,余琳,等.基于Robson分类系统分析不同类型的阴道试产失败中转剖宫产的构成及母儿结局[J].中华妇产科杂志,2019,54(8):512-515.
[5] RIZZO G,BITSADZE V,KHIZROEVA J,et al.Role of ante-partum ultrasound in predicting vaginal birth after cesarean section:a prospective cohort study[J].Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2021,256(1):385-390.
[6] 中华医学会妇产科学分会妊娠期高血压疾病学组.妊娠期高血压疾病诊治指南(2020)[J].中华妇产科杂志,2020,55(4):227-238.
[7] 倪平,陈京立,刘娜.护理研究中量性研究的样本量估计[J].中华护理杂志,2010,45(4):378-380.
[8] 孙振晓,刘化学,焦林瑛,等.医院焦虑抑郁量表的信度及效度研究[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2017,11(2):198-201.
[9] 李奕,晋兴林,蒋玉芬.瘢痕子宫再次妊娠产妇经阴道分娩试产失败因素分析[J].中国医药导报,2022,19(14):28-31.
[10]姜海利,李金皎,贾音,等.子痫前期孕妇产时中转剖宫产的临床特征和危险因素[J].中国医科大学学报,2021,50(10):885-889.
[11]孙芳璨,吴芳芳,沈敏红,等.足月妊娠低风险初产妇阴道试产失败中转剖宫产预测模型的建立[J].中华围产医学杂志,2020,23(7):460-468.
[12]KAWAKITA T,REDDY U M,HUANG C C,et al.Predicting vaginal delivery in nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor at term[J].Am J Perinatol,2018,35(7):660-668.
[13]ZEHRAVI M,MAQBOOL M,ARA I.Correlation between obesity,gestational diabetes mellitus,and pregnancy outcomes:an overview[J].Int J Adolesc Med Health,2021,33(6):339-345.
[14]KWON H Y,KWON J Y,PARK Y W,et al.The risk of emergency cesarean section after failure of vaginal delivery according to prepregnancy body mass index or gestational weight gain by the 2009 institute of medicine guidelines[J].Obstet Gynecol Sci,2016,59(3):169-177.
[15]赵胡英,潘石蕾,刘映玲,等.孕前超重/肥胖对母儿结局及产程的影响研究[J].现代妇产科进展,2019,28(6):416-419.
[16]赵瑞芬,张为远,周莉.初产妇孕前体质指数及孕期体质量增加量与产程中行紧急剖宫产术风险的关系[J].中华妇产科杂志,2017,52(11):757-764.
[17]RANA S,LEMOINE E,GRANGER J P,et al.Preeclampsia:pathophysiology,challenges,and perspectives[J].Circ Res,2019,124(7):1094-1112.
[18]ADEKANMI A J,ROBERTS A,AKINMOLADUN J A,et al.Uterine and umbilical artery doppler in women with pre-eclampsia and their pregnancy outcomes[J].Niger Postgrad Med J,2019,26(2):106-112.
[19]倪丽君.妊娠期高血压疾病对妊娠结局的影响以及相关危险因素分析[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2021,32(1):65-69.
[20]VETTORAZZO BEATRZI G,BARROS THAIS R,BARBOSA TALITA M,et al.P-062.Success of vaginal parturiation in pregnant women with preeclampsia submitted to induction of delivery after cervical ripening[J].Pregnancy Hypertens,2021,25(S1):e49.
[21]MI Y,QU P,GUO N,et al.Evaluation of factors that predict the success rate of trial of labor after the cesarean section[J].BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,2021,21(1):527.
[22]陈晓明,陈震宇,孙静莉,等.剖宫产术后再次妊娠经阴道分娩预测模型的建立及验证[J].现代妇产科进展,2021,30(8):601-605.
[23]孙瑜,张艳榕,李春艳,等.非重度妊娠期高血压和子痫前期孕妇促宫颈成熟方式对比研究[J].中国临床医生杂志,2022,50(9):1099-1102.
[24]LINDBIAD WOLLMANN C,HART KD,LIU C,et al.Predicting vaginal birth after previous cesarean:using machine-learning models and a population-based cohort in Sweden[J].Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,2021,100(3):513-520.
[25]陈慧,陈颖文,阴红,等.高龄经产妇阴道试产失败中转剖宫产预测模型的建立[J].实用妇产科杂志,2021,37(8):614-617.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2023-05-15 【修回日期】2023-07-22
【基金项目】南通市科技项目合同(MS22021004)
【作者简介】江丹丹,本科,主管护师,电话:0513-81160735
【通信作者】丁亚囡,电话:0513-81160736
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-11-15