[1]陈天喜,姜岱山,沈艳,等.基于决策树的急性创伤性脑损伤患者早期死亡风险分诊模型的构建及验证[J].军事护理,2023,40(10):34-38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2023.10.009]
　CHEN Tianxi,JIANG Daishan,SHEN Yan,et al.A Triage Model of Early Death Risk Prediction in Acute Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Based on the Decision Tree: Construction and Validation[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2023,40(10):34-38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2023.10.009]
点击复制

基于决策树的急性创伤性脑损伤患者早期死亡风险分诊模型的构建及验证
分享到：

《军事护理》[ISSN:2097-1826/CN:31-3186/R]

卷:
40
期数:
2023年10期
页码:
34-38
栏目:
研究荟萃
出版日期:
2023-10-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Triage Model of Early Death Risk Prediction in Acute Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Based on the Decision Tree: Construction and Validation
文章编号:
2097-1826(2023)10-0034-05
作者:
陈天喜1; 姜岱山2; 沈艳2; 王伶俐1; 孙宏1; 张佳佳1
(1.南通大学附属医院 护理部,江苏 南通 226001; 2.南通大学附属医院 急诊医学科)
Author(s):
CHEN Tianxi1; JIANG Daishan2; SHEN Yan2; WANG Lingli1; SUN Hong1; ZHANG Jiajia1
(1.Nursing Department,Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University,Nantong 226001,Jiangsu Province,China; 2.Department of Emergency,Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University)
关键词:
急性创伤性脑损伤;  预后;  死亡率;  格拉斯哥昏迷评分;  决策树
Keywords:
acute traumatic brain injury;  prognosis;  mortality;  Glasgow coma scale;  decision tree
分类号:
R472.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2023.10.009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 构建并验证基于决策树的急性创伤性脑损伤(traumatic brain injury,TBI)患者早期死亡风险分诊模型,为急诊分诊提供准确、直观的新工具。方法 回顾性收集某院急性TBI患者2287例的临床数据,构建早期死亡风险的分诊模型,采用十字交叉验证,并与改良早期预警评分(modified early waring score,MEWS)、修正创伤评分(revised trauma score,RTS)、改良快速急诊医学评分(the modified rapid emergency medicine score,mREMS)及损伤机制格拉斯哥年龄血压评分(mechanism,Glasgow coma scale,age and arterial pressure score,MGAP)比较预测效能。结果 2287例急性TBI患者中,24 h内发生死亡者166例。决策树共3层,15个节点,筛选出6个解释变量,分别是瞳孔反应性、RTS、MGAP、MEWS、血氧饱和度及收缩压。决策树模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.917,高于MEWS、RTS、MGAP评分和mREMS,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论 基于决策树构建的急性TBI患者早期死亡风险分诊模型能准确预测急性TBI患者24 h内死亡风险,可作为医护人员分诊的决策依据。
Abstract:
Objective To construct and validate a triage model of early death risk prediction in acute traumatic brain injury(TBI)patients based on the decision tree,and to provide a novel,accurate,intuitive tool for emergency triage.Methods The clinical data of 2,287 acute TBI patients in a hospital were retrospectively collected,and a triage model for early death risk prediction was constructed.Cross validation was used for validation.The prediction efficiency of this model was compared with that of modified early waring score(MEWS),revised trauma score(RTS),the modified rapid emergency medicine score(mREMS)and Mechanism,Glasgow coma scale,age and arterial pressure scores(MGAP).Results There were 166 subjects died within 24 hours among the 2287 acute TBI patients.The decision tree had 3 layers and 15 nodes,with 6 explanatory variables,namely,pupillary reactivity,RTS,MGAP,MEWS,oxygen saturation of blood and systolic pressure.The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the triage model was 0.917,which was higher than that of MEWS、RTS、MGAP and mREMS(all P<0.05).Conclusion The triage model of early death risk prediction in acute TBI patients based on the decision tree can accurately predict acute TBI patients' death risk within 24 hours which can serve as a decision basis for medical staff triaging.It can provide reference for medical staff's triage.

参考文献/References:

[1] BRAZINOVA A,REHORCIKOVA V,TAYLOR M S,et al.Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in Europe:a living systematic review[J].J Neurotrauma,2021,38(10):1411-1440.
[2] JIANG J Y,GAO G Y,FENG J F,et al.Traumatic brain injury in China[J].Lancet Neurol,2019,18(3):286-295.
[3] 阮霄睿,成佩霞,胡国清.2000-2019年我国颅脑创伤的发病率与患病率趋势分析[J].中华神经外科杂志,2021,37(12):1223-1229.
[4] CHAMPION H R,SACCO W J,COPES W S,et al.A revision of the trauma score[J].J Trauma,1989,29(5):623-629.
[5] SARTORIUS D,LE MANACH Y,DAVID J S,et al.Mechanism,glasgow coma scale,age,and arterial pressure(MGAP):a new simple prehospital triage score to predict mortality in trauma patients[J].Crit Care Med,2010,38(3):831-837.
[6] MILLER R T,NAZIR N,MCDONALD T,et al.The modified rapid emergency medicine score:a novel trauma triage tool to predict in-hospital mortality[J].Injury,2017,48(9):1870-1877.
[7] JIANG X,JIANG P,MAO Y.Performance of modified early warning score(MEWS)and circulation,respiration,abdomen,motor,and speech(CRAMS)score in trauma severity and in-hospital mortality prediction in multiple trauma patients:a comparison study[J/OL].[2023-01-31].https://peerj.com/articles/7227/.DOI:10.7717/peerj.7227.
[8] PAGET L M,BOUTONNET M,MOYER J D,et al.Trauma centre admissions for traumatic brain injury in France:one-year epidemiological analysis of prospectively collected data[J/OL].[2023-01-31].https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352556821000072?via%3Dihub.DOI:10.1016/j.accpm.2021.100804.
[9] KADAR1 R,ROCHFORD D,OMI E,et al.Trends in demographics and outcome of patients presenting with traumatic brain injury[J].Clin Exp Emerg Med,2019,6(2):113-118.
[10]STEYERBERG E W,MUSHKUDIANI N,PEREL P,et al.Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury:development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics[J/OL].[2023-01-30].https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0050165.DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050165.
[11]CRASH-3 Trial Collaborators.Effects of tranexamic acid on death,disability,vascular occlusive events and other morbidities in patients with acute traumatic brain injury(CRASH-3):a randomised,placebo-controlled trial[J].Lancet,2019,394(10210):1713-1723.
[12]KIM D K,LEE D H,LEE B K,et al.Performance of modified early warning score(MEWS)for predicting in-hospital mortality in traumatic brain injury patients[J/OL].[2023-02-10].https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8124302/.DOI:10.3390/jcm10091915.
[13]《加重继发性脑损伤危险因素防治专家共识》专家组.颅脑创伤后加重继发性脑损伤的危险因素防治专家共识[J].临床神经外科杂志,2020,17(3):241-249,253.
[14]HUANG H K,LIU C Y,TZENG I S,et al.The association between blood pressure and in-hospital mortality in traumatic brain injury:evidence from a 10-year analysis in a single-center[J].Am J Emerg Med,2022,58:265-274.
[15]NAJAFI Z,ZAKERI H,MIRHAGHI A.The accuracy of acuity scoring tools to predict 24 h mortality in traumatic brain injury patients:a guide to triage criteria[J].Int Emerg Nurs,2018,36:27-33.
[16]陈天喜,姜岱山,王伶俐,等.不同评分方法对急性创伤性脑损伤患者早期死亡风险的预测价值[J].中华创伤杂志,2022,38(5):407-412.
[17]DE SOUZA BARBOSA G,DE OLIVEIRA GASPAR J,DE SOUZA NOGUEIRA L,et al.Performance of the modified rapid emergency medicine score in patients with and without traumatic brain injury[J].J Neurosci Nurs,2022,54(3):130-135.
[18]LEE S H,LIM D,KIM D H,et al.Predictor of isolated trauma in head:a new simple predictor for survival of isolated traumatic brain injury[J].J Emerg Med,2018,54(4):427-434.
[19]ALQURASHI N,ALOTAIBI A,BELL S,et al.The diagnostic accuracy of prehospital triage tools in identifying patients with traumatic brain injury:a systematic review[J].Injury,2022,53(6):2060-2068.
[20]BOYD C R,TOLSON M A,COPES W S.Evaluating trauma care:the TRISS method.Trauma score and the injury severity score[J].J Trauma,1987,27(4):370-378.
[21]梅润,何乾峰,徐璐瑶,等.基于决策树构建急诊创伤患者低体温早期预警模型及验证[J].军事护理,2023,40(5):14-17.

相似文献/References:

[1]何艳,刘文婷,赵阳,等.老年鼻咽癌患者营养风险指数与同期放化疗预后的关系研究[J].军事护理,2022,39(02):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2022.02.010]
　HE Yan,LIU Wenting,ZHAO Yang,et al.Relationship Between Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index and Prognosis of Elderly Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma During Concurrent Chemotherapy Radiotherapy[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2022,39(10):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2022.02.010]
[2]刘雨婷,李育平,黄羽佳,等.我国脑卒中预测研究的热点和前沿的可视化分析[J].军事护理,2022,39(03):48.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2022.03.012]
　LIU Yuting,LI Yuping,HUANG Yujia,et al.Visual Analysis: Research Hotspots and Frontiers of Stroke Prediction in China[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People's Laberation Army,2022,39(10):48.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2022.03.012]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2023-02-10【修回日期】2023-08-18
【基金项目】南通市卫健委指令性课题面上项目(MS2022010)
【作者简介】陈天喜,硕士,副主任护师,电话:0513-85052110
【通信作者】姜岱山,电话:0513-85052039
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-10-15