[1]陈灵熙,周云仙.运用扎根理论的护理学位论文在文献回顾方面的应用误区探讨[J].解放军护理杂志,2021,38(06):30-33.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.06.008]
 CHEN Lingxi,ZHOU Yunxian.Errors Analysis in the Literature Review Section of the Nursuing Dissertations on Grounded Theory[J].Nursing Journal Of Chinese People’s Laberation Army,2021,38(06):30-33.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.06.008]
点击复制

运用扎根理论的护理学位论文在文献回顾方面的应用误区探讨()
分享到:

《解放军护理杂志》[ISSN:2097-1826/CN:31-3186/R]

卷:
38
期数:
2021年06期
页码:
30-33
栏目:
研究荟萃
出版日期:
2021-06-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Errors Analysis in the Literature Review Section of the Nursuing Dissertations on Grounded Theory
文章编号:
1008-9993(2021)06-0030-04
作者:
陈灵熙周云仙
浙江中医药大学 护理学院,浙江 杭州 310000
Author(s):
CHEN LingxiZHOU Yunxian
Nursing College,Zhejiang Traditional Chinese Medicine,Hangzhou 31000,Zhejiang Province,China
关键词:
扎根理论 学位论文 文献回顾 时间 范围 护理
Keywords:
grounded theory dissertations literature review time scope nursing
分类号:
R47
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.06.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 分析我国护理领域运用扎根理论的硕博士学位论文在文献回顾方面存在的主要问题。方法 在万方数据库、中国期刊全文数据库和中国生物医学文献数据库中查询我国护理领域近20年来采用扎根理论的硕博士学位论文,由两名研究员根据论文评价标准独立分析,指出其存在的错误认识和做法,并备注参考性建议。结果 共纳入论文17篇。文献回顾时间上,29.4%的论文未能明确文献回顾时间,58.8%的论文未搁置文献对研究的影响,64.7%的论文未在研究各个阶段均进行文献回顾; 文献回顾范围上,47.1%的论文未细分文献种类,76.5%的论文未合理指明文献回顾的广度和深度。结论 我国护理学者在撰写扎根理论论文时,存在较多文献回顾方面的问题,应加强相关知识积累,掌握正确应用方法。
Abstract:
Objective To analyze major errors in the literature review section of the master and doctoral dissertations on grounded theory in Chinese nursing field.Methods Wanfang,CNKI and CBM Databases were searched for master and doctoral dissertations on grounded theory in Chinese nursing field over the past two decades.Two researchers analyzed the dissertations independently,pointed out errors and inappropriate research practice based on evaluation criteria,and offered some suggestions for reference.Results 17 dissertations were included in the research.In terms of literature review timeframe,29.4% of dissertations failed to indicate the time of literature review clearly,58.8% of dissertations failed to suspend impacts of literature,and 64.7% of dissertations failed to review literature in all research stages.In terms of literature review scope,41.7% of dissertations failed to divide types of literature,and 76.5% of dissertations failed to reasonably indicate breadth and depth of literature review.Conclusions There are some problems in the literature review section in grounded theory dissertations in Chinese nursing field.It’s necessary to strengthen relevant knowledge and master the correct writing skills.

参考文献/References:

[1] COLLINS K M T,ONWUEGBUZIE A J,JIAO Q G.Toward a broader understanding of stress and coping:mixed methods approaches[M].NC:Information Age Publishing,2010:169-171.
[2] BOOTE D N,BEILE P.Scholars before researchers:on the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation[J].Educ Researcher,2005,34(6): 3-15.
[3] 周云仙.护理质性研究理论与案例[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2017:41-50,58.
[4] 瞿海源,毕恒达,刘长萱,等.社会及行为科学研究法:质性研究法[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2013:61-62.
[5] STRAUSS A L,CORBIN J M.Basics of qualitative research:techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory[M].London:Sage Pulications Ltd,1998:35-53.
[6] GLASER B,STRAUSS A.The discovery of grounded theory:strategies for qualitative research[M].Chicago:Aldine Publishing Company,1967:37-38.
[7] GLASER B.Theoretical sensitivity[M].Mill Valley:The Sociology Press,1978:31-32.
[8] 巴尼·格拉泽.扎根理论研究概论:自然呈现与生硬促成[M].费小冬,译.上海:上海社会科学院出版社,2009:30-35.
[9] CHARMAZ K.Constructing grounded theory:a practical guide through qualitative analysis[M].London:Sage Pulications Ltd,2006:165-168.
[10]GILES T,KING L,DE LACEY S.The timing of the literature review in grounded theory research:an open mind versus an empty head[J].ANS Adv Nurs Sci,2013,36(2):E29-E40.
[11]DUNNE C.The place of the literature review in grounded theory research[J].Int J Soc Res Method,2011,14(2): 111-124.
[12]DEERING K,WILLIAMS J.Approaches to reviewing the literature in grounded theory:a framework[J/OL].[2021-03-25].https://journals.rcni.com/nurse-researcher/evidence-and-practice/approaches-to-reviewing-the-literature-in-grounded-theory-a-framework-nr.2020.e1752/abs.
[13]MCCALLIN A.Grappling with the literature in a grounded theory study[J].Contemp Nurse,2003,15(1-2):61-69.
[14]WALLS P,PARAHOO K,FLEMING P.The role and place of knowledge and literature in grounded theory[J].Nurse Res,2010,17(4):8-17.
[15]YARWOOD-ROSS L,JACK K.Using extant literature in a grounded theory study:a personal account[J].Nurse Res,2015,22(4):18-24.
[16]HUSSEIN M,KENNEDY A,OLIVER B.Grounded theory and the conundrum of literature review:framework for novice researchers[J].Qualitative Report,2017,22(4):1199-1210.
[17]陈向明,王富伟.扎根理论研究需要如何读文献?——兼论扎根理论不同版本的界定之争[J].比较教育学报,2020(2): 3-14.
[18]周璇.艰难的回归:脑卒中患者社会参与的变化与发展过程[D].上海:海军军医大学,2019.
[19]黄碧珊.基于扎根理论的护理难度理论框架的构建研究[D].福州:福建医科大学,2016.
[20]阮佳音.克罗恩病患者患病体验的质性研究[D].杭州:浙江中医药大学,2016.
[21]夏桦.本科护生专业认知形成过程的质性研究[D].杭州:浙江中医药大学,2016.
[22]叶旭春.患者参与患者安全的感知及理论框架的扎根理论研究[D].上海:第二军医大学,2011.
[23]李苗苗.冠心病患者二级预防依从性概念及理论框架的构建[D].保定:河北大学,2015.
[24]李军文.透视护士长的领导效能:实现价值提升——对成都7家非营利性三甲医院12位护士长的一项质性研究[D].成都:四川大学,2005.
[25]汪玲珍.腹膜透析患者高磷血症服药依从性的质性研究[D].广州:广州中医药大学,2019.
[26]付光蕾.急诊医护人员遭受工作场所身体暴力事件后真实体验的质性研究[D].广州:暨南大学,2013.
[27]张蕾.癌症患者熟虑式沉思内容的质性研究[D].太原:山西大学,2012.
[28]张姮.老年慢性病人健康赋权理论框架的构建[D].上海:第二军医大学,2012.
[29]尹志科.器官捐献动机的质性研究[D].长沙:中南大学,2012.
[30]徐然.大专护生实习过程中人际需求的质性研究[D].重庆:重庆医科大学,2015.
[31]林岑.具有“坚强”特质的乳腺癌患者的抗癌体验:一项扎根理论研究[D].上海:复旦大学,2007.
[32]龙梦云.医学专业患者及其护理人员真实体验的质性研究[D].重庆:重庆医科大学,2018.
[33]焦丹丹.急性心肌梗死患者心理体验的质性研究[D].郑州:河南科技大学,2015.
[34]章莹.社区中老年人预防老年痴呆生活方式问题的质性研究——以K社区为例[D].杭州:杭州师范大学,2015.
[35]URQUHART C,LEHMANN H,MYERS M D.Putting the ‘theory’back into grounded theory:guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems[J].Inform Syst J,2010,20(4):357-381.
[36]吴毅,吴刚,马颂歌.扎根理论的起源、流派与应用方法述评——基于工作场所学习的案例分析[J].远程教育杂志,2016,35(3):32-41.
[37]MCGHEE G,MARLAND G R,ATKINSON J.Grounded theory research:literature reviewing and reflexivity[J].J Adv Nurs,2007,60(3):334-342.
[38]ALVESSON M,SKOLDBERG K.Reflexive methodology:new vistas for qualitative research[M].London:Sage Pulications Ltd,2000:238-293.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【 收稿日期 】 2021-02-08 【 修回日期 】 2021-05-02
【 基金项目 】 2020年浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2020KY193)
【 作者简介 】 陈灵熙,硕士在读,从事慢性病管理研究
【 通信作者 】 周云仙,电话:0571-86633121
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-06-15